El-Esawi Mohamed A, Witczak Jacques, Abomohra Abd El-Fatah, Ali Hayssam M, Elshikh Mohamed S, Ahmad Margaret
UMR CNRS 8256 (B2A), Université Paris VI, 75005 Paris, France.
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt.
Genes (Basel). 2018 Jan 22;9(1):47. doi: 10.3390/genes9010047.
Analysis of crop genetic diversity and structure provides valuable information needed to broaden the narrow genetic base as well as to enhance the breeding and conservation strategies of crops. In this study, 95 Austrian and Belgian wheat cultivars maintained at the Centre for Genetic Resources (CGN) in the Netherlands were characterised using 1052 diversity array technology (DArT) markers to evaluate their genetic diversity, relationships and population structure. The rarefacted allelic richness recorded in the Austrian and Belgian breeding pools ( = 1.396 and 1.341, respectively) indicated that the Austrian germplasm contained a higher genetic diversity than the Belgian pool. The expected heterozygosity () values of the Austrian and Belgian pools were 0.411 and 0.375, respectively. Moreover, the values of the polymorphic information content (PIC) of the Austrian and Belgian pools were 0.337 and 0.298, respectively. Neighbour-joining tree divided each of the Austrian and Belgian germplasm pools into two genetically distinct groups. The structure analyses of the Austrian and Belgian pools were in a complete concordance with their neighbour-joining trees. Furthermore, the 95 cultivars were compared to 618 wheat genotypes from nine European countries based on a total of 141 common DArT markers in order to place the Austrian and Belgian wheat germplasm in a wider European context. The rarefacted allelic richness () varied from 1.224 (Denmark) to 1.397 (Austria). Cluster and principal coordinates (PCoA) analyses divided the wheat genotypes of the nine European countries into two main clusters. The first cluster comprised the Northern and Western European wheat genotypes, whereas the second included the Central European cultivars. The structure analysis of the 618 European wheat genotypes was in a complete concordance with the results of cluster and PCoA analyses. Interestingly, a highly significant difference was recorded between regions (26.53%). In conclusion, this is the first study to reveal the high diversity levels and structure of the uncharacterised Austrian and Belgian wheat germplasm maintained at the CGN as well as place them in a wider European context. The results should help plant breeders to utilise the most promising wheat genotypes of this study in future breeding programmes for enhancing wheat cultivars.
作物遗传多样性和结构分析为拓宽狭窄的遗传基础以及加强作物育种和保护策略提供了所需的宝贵信息。在本研究中,利用1052个多样性阵列技术(DArT)标记对保存在荷兰遗传资源中心(CGN)的95个奥地利和比利时小麦品种进行了特征分析,以评估它们的遗传多样性、亲缘关系和群体结构。奥地利和比利时育种群体中记录的矫正等位基因丰富度(分别为1.396和1.341)表明,奥地利种质的遗传多样性高于比利时群体。奥地利和比利时群体的预期杂合度()值分别为0.411和0.375。此外,奥地利和比利时群体的多态信息含量(PIC)值分别为0.337和0.298。邻接树将奥地利和比利时种质库中的每一个都分为两个遗传上不同的组。奥地利和比利时群体的结构分析与它们的邻接树完全一致。此外,基于总共141个共同的DArT标记,将这95个品种与来自9个欧洲国家的618个小麦基因型进行了比较,以便将奥地利和比利时小麦种质置于更广泛的欧洲背景下。矫正等位基因丰富度()从1.224(丹麦)到1.397(奥地利)不等。聚类分析和主坐标分析(PCoA)将9个欧洲国家的小麦基因型分为两个主要聚类。第一个聚类包括北欧和西欧的小麦基因型,而第二个聚类包括中欧的品种。618个欧洲小麦基因型的结构分析与聚类分析和PCoA分析的结果完全一致。有趣的是,各地区之间存在极显著差异(26.53%)。总之,这是第一项揭示保存在CGN的未表征的奥地利和比利时小麦种质的高多样性水平和结构,并将它们置于更广泛的欧洲背景下的研究。这些结果应有助于植物育种者在未来的育种计划中利用本研究中最有前景的小麦基因型来改良小麦品种。