Devereux R B, Alonso D R, Lutas E M, Gottlieb G J, Campo E, Sachs I, Reichek N
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Feb 15;57(6):450-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90771-x.
To determine the accuracy of echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) dimension and mass measurements for detection and quantification of LV hypertrophy, results of blindly read antemortem echocardiograms were compared with LV mass measurements made at necropsy in 55 patients. LV mass was calculated using M-mode LV measurements by Penn and American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) conventions and cube function and volume correction formulas in 52 patients. Penn-cube LV mass correlated closely with necropsy LV mass (r = 0.92, p less than 0.001) and overestimated it by only 6%; sensitivity in 18 patients with LV hypertrophy (necropsy LV mass more than 215 g) was 100% (18 of 18 patients) and specificity was 86% (29 of 34 patients). ASE-cube LV mass correlated similarly to necropsy LV mass (r = 0.90, p less than 0.001), but systematically overestimated it (by a mean of 25%); the overestimation could be corrected by the equation: LV mass = 0.80 (ASE-cube LV mass) + 0.6 g. Use of ASE measurements in the volume correction formula systematically underestimated necropsy LV mass (by a mean of 30%). In a subset of 9 patients, 3 of whom had technically inadequate M-mode echocardiograms, 2-dimensional echocardiographic (echo) LV mass by 2 methods was also significantly related to necropsy LV mass (r = 0.68, p less than 0.05 and r = 0.82, p less than 0.01). Among other indexes of LV anatomy, only measurement of myocardial cross-sectional area was acceptably accurate for quantitation of LV mass (r = 0.80, p less than 0.001) or diagnosis of LV hypertrophy (sensitivity = 72%, specificity = 94%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为确定超声心动图测量左心室(LV)尺寸和质量以检测和量化LV肥厚的准确性,将55例患者生前超声心动图盲法解读结果与尸检时LV质量测量结果进行比较。52例患者使用Penn和美国超声心动图学会(ASE)的M型LV测量、立方函数及容积校正公式计算LV质量。Penn立方法LV质量与尸检LV质量密切相关(r = 0.92,p<0.001),仅高估6%;18例LV肥厚患者(尸检LV质量超过215 g)的敏感性为100%(18/18例患者),特异性为86%(34例患者中的29例)。ASE立方法LV质量与尸检LV质量的相关性相似(r = 0.90,p<0.001),但系统性高估(平均高估25%);高估可通过以下公式校正:LV质量 = 0.80(ASE立方法LV质量)+ 0.6 g。在容积校正公式中使用ASE测量系统性低估尸检LV质量(平均低估30%)。在9例患者的亚组中,其中3例M型超声心动图技术上不充分,两种方法测得的二维超声心动图(echo)LV质量也与尸检LV质量显著相关(r = 0.68,p<0.05和r = 0.82,p<0.01)。在LV解剖的其他指标中,仅心肌横截面积测量在定量LV质量(r = 0.80,p<0.001)或诊断LV肥厚方面准确性可接受(敏感性 = 72%,特异性 = 94%)。(摘要截断于250字)