Regacini Rodrigo, Puchnick Andrea, Luisi Flavio Augusto Vercillo, Lederman Henrique Manoel
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Napoleão de Barros, 800, São Paulo, 04024-002, Brazil.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Educational and Research Support, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 May;48(5):638-647. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4071-6. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
Although positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET/CT) has been recommended as the method of choice for lymphoma staging, it has limited availability in several countries, therefore, studies comparing whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to conventional staging methods or to FDG-PET/CT are an important tool to establish whole-body MRI as an alternative to these methods.
To compare whole-body MRI versus conventional imaging methods for staging of Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adolescents.
The study included 22 patients ages 5 to 21 years. Staging was performed using conventional imaging methods and whole-body MRI. Conventional imaging methods were defined as computed tomography (CT) of the neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis and ultrasonography of the neck and/or abdomen. We calculated the sensitivity of these methods for Hodgkin lymphoma staging and their sensitivity and specificity for detecting sites of nodal and extranodal involvement.
The sensitivity of whole-body MRI for Hodgkin lymphoma staging was superior to that of conventional imaging methods (95.5% vs. 86.4%, respectively), but both methods had similar sensitivity and specificity for detecting involvement of nodal sites (99.1% and 100% vs. 97.3% and 100%, respectively) and extranodal sites (90.5% and 98.7% vs. 90.5% and 99.4%, respectively).
Whole-body MRI has excellent sensitivity for staging of Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adolescents. It can thus be considered an alternative for this purpose, particularly because it does not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
尽管18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)已被推荐作为淋巴瘤分期的首选方法,但在一些国家其可用性有限。因此,比较全身磁共振成像(MRI)与传统分期方法或FDG-PET/CT的研究是确立全身MRI作为这些方法替代方案的重要工具。
比较全身MRI与传统成像方法在儿童和青少年霍奇金淋巴瘤分期中的应用。
该研究纳入了22例年龄在5至21岁的患者。采用传统成像方法和全身MRI进行分期。传统成像方法定义为颈部、胸部、腹部和骨盆的计算机断层扫描(CT)以及颈部和/或腹部的超声检查。我们计算了这些方法对霍奇金淋巴瘤分期的敏感性及其检测淋巴结和结外受累部位的敏感性和特异性。
全身MRI对霍奇金淋巴瘤分期的敏感性优于传统成像方法(分别为95.5%和86.4%),但两种方法在检测淋巴结部位受累(分别为99.1%和100%对97.3%和100%)和结外部位受累(分别为90.5%和98.7%对90.5%和99.4%)方面具有相似的敏感性和特异性。
全身MRI对儿童和青少年霍奇金淋巴瘤分期具有出色的敏感性。因此,可将其视为用于此目的的替代方法,特别是因为它不会使患者暴露于电离辐射。