Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, CA. 1201 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
University of North Texas Health Science Center, Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, TX, 3500 Camp Bowie Boulevard, Fort Worth, TX, 76107-2699, USA.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 May;50(6):1689-1698. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06122-6. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
To assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body (WB) DW-MRI with 2-[F]FDG PET for staging and treatment monitoring of children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH).
Twenty-three children with LCH underwent 2-[F]FDG PET and WB DW-MRI at baseline. Two nuclear medicine physicians and two radiologists independently assessed presence/absence of tumors in 8 anatomical areas. Sixteen children also performed 2-[F]FDG PET and WB DW-MRI at follow-up. One radiologist and one nuclear medicine physician revised follow-up scans and collected changes in tumor apparent diffusion (ADC) and standardized uptake values (SUV) before and after therapy in all detectable lesions. 2-[F]FDG PET results were considered the standard of reference for tumor detection and evaluation of treatment response according to Lugano criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of WB DW-MRI at baseline were calculated, and the 95% confidence intervals were estimated by using the Clopper-Pearson (exact) method; changes in tumor SUVs and ADC were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test. Agreement between reviewers was assessed with a Cohen's weighted kappa coefficient. Analyses were conducted using SAS software version 9.4.
Agreement between reviewers was perfect (kappa coefficient = 1) for all analyzed regions but spine and neck (kappa coefficient = 0.89 and 0.83, respectively) for 2-[F]FDG PET images, and abdomen and pelvis (kappa coefficient = 0.65 and 0.88, respectively) for WB DW-MRI. Sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% and 100% for WB DW-MRI compared to 2-[F]FDG PET. Pre to post-treatment changes in SUV and ADC were inversely correlated for all lesions (r: -0.27, p = 0·06) and significantly different between responders and non-responders to chemotherapy (p = 0.0006 and p = 0·003 for SUV and ADC, respectively).
Our study showed that WB DW-MRI has similar accuracy to 2-[F]FDG PET for staging and treatment monitoring of LCH in children. While 2-[F]FDG PET remains an approved radiological examination for assessing metabolically active disease, WB DW-MRI could be considered as an alternative approach without radiation exposure. The combination of both modalities might have advantages over either approach alone.
评估和比较全身(WB)弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)与 2-[F]FDG PET 在儿童朗格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症(LCH)分期和治疗监测中的诊断准确性。
23 例 LCH 患儿在基线时接受 2-[F]FDG PET 和 WB DW-MRI 检查。两名核医学医师和两名放射科医师分别独立评估 8 个解剖区域的肿瘤存在/不存在情况。16 例患儿在随访时也进行了 2-[F]FDG PET 和 WB DW-MRI 检查。一名放射科医师和一名核医学医师修订了随访扫描结果,并在所有可检测病灶中收集治疗前后肿瘤表观扩散系数(ADC)和标准化摄取值(SUV)的变化。根据卢加诺标准,2-[F]FDG PET 结果被视为肿瘤检测和治疗反应评估的标准。通过使用 Clopper-Pearson(精确)方法计算 WB DW-MRI 在基线时的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及诊断准确性,并估计 95%置信区间;使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较肿瘤 SUV 和 ADC 的变化。使用 Cohen 的加权 Kappa 系数评估审查员之间的一致性。使用 SAS 软件版本 9.4 进行分析。
对于所有分析区域,审查员之间的一致性均为完美(Kappa 系数=1),但对于脊柱和颈部(Kappa 系数分别为 0.89 和 0.83)和腹部和骨盆(Kappa 系数分别为 0.65 和 0.88),2-[F]FDG PET 图像的一致性为完美。与 2-[F]FDG PET 相比,WB DW-MRI 的敏感性和特异性分别为 95.5%和 100%。所有病灶的 SUV 和 ADC 的治疗前后变化呈负相关(r:-0.27,p=0.06),且对化疗的反应者和非反应者之间差异有统计学意义(SUV 和 ADC 的 p 值分别为 0.0006 和 0.003)。
我们的研究表明,WB DW-MRI 在儿童 LCH 的分期和治疗监测中与 2-[F]FDG PET 具有相似的准确性。虽然 2-[F]FDG PET 仍然是评估代谢活跃疾病的批准影像学检查方法,但 WB DW-MRI 可以作为一种无辐射暴露的替代方法。两种方法的结合可能比单独使用任何一种方法都具有优势。