The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 3333 Binsheng Road, Hangzhou, 310052, Zhejiang, China.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2018 May;310(4):261-269. doi: 10.1007/s00403-018-1815-y. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
A number of clinical trials evaluated the effect of topical timolol in the treatment of infantile hemangioma and provided inconsistent results. The present study assessed the response rate and adverse events of topical timolol in the treatment of infantile hemangioma. Pubmed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Cochrane library were searched until October 2016. Specific inclusion criteria were used to evaluate articles. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The meta-analysis was performed using a random effect model. A total of 10 studies, comprising 887 infants with hemangioma, were included. The response rate was reported in eight trials; these studies compared the topical timolol to laser, observation, placebo, or propranolol. The heterogeneity was statistically significant (P < 0.00001, I = 83%). The difference in the response rate was significant (RR = 2.86, 95% CI 1.31-6.24) while comparing the topical timolol to the controls. However, no significant difference in the response rate was observed while comparing the topical timolol to propranolol (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.70-1.42). The difference in the adverse events was found to be significant (RR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.97) when the timolol group was compared to the control group. This meta-analysis confirmed that the topical timolol alone was more beneficial on response rate and adverse event than laser, placebo, and observation. The response rate did not differ significantly when comparing the topical timolol to propranolol. However, further studies are essential using an improved design of the study.
许多临床试验评估了局部噻吗洛尔治疗婴幼儿血管瘤的效果,但结果并不一致。本研究评估了局部噻吗洛尔治疗婴幼儿血管瘤的反应率和不良事件。检索了 Pubmed、Embase、中国知网(CNKI)、万方和 Cochrane 图书馆,检索时间截至 2016 年 10 月。使用特定的纳入标准评估文章。使用随机效应模型计算风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。共纳入 10 项研究,共 887 例血管瘤患儿。其中 8 项研究报告了反应率,这些研究将局部噻吗洛尔与激光、观察、安慰剂或普萘洛尔进行了比较。异质性具有统计学意义(P<0.00001,I=83%)。与对照组相比,局部噻吗洛尔的反应率差异显著(RR=2.86,95%CI 1.31-6.24)。然而,与普萘洛尔相比,局部噻吗洛尔的反应率无显著差异(RR=0.99,95%CI 0.70-1.42)。与对照组相比,噻吗洛尔组的不良事件差异显著(RR=0.21,95%CI 0.05-0.97)。本荟萃分析证实,与激光、安慰剂和观察相比,局部噻吗洛尔单独使用在反应率和不良事件方面更有优势。与普萘洛尔相比,局部噻吗洛尔的反应率无显著差异。然而,需要进一步的研究,以提高研究设计。