Suppr超能文献

局部用噻吗洛尔与口服普萘洛尔联合治疗婴儿血管瘤的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Efficacy of Combined Topical Timolol and Oral Propranolol for Treating Infantile Hemangioma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Qiao Junbo, Lin Junjie, Zhang Dexin, Li Junhua, Chen Changkuan, Yu Hongye, Li Xiaodi, Fang Bin

机构信息

Department of Hemangioma Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2020 Oct 8;11:554847. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.554847. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral propranolol has become the first-line treatment for infantile hemangioma (IH). However, combined therapy with topical timolol and oral propranolol has been proposed as a more effective IH treatment strategy. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of topical timolol, oral propranolol, and their combination for treating IH in a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained after searching the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane's Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang databases. A random-effect model was used to pool the results.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs with 759 patients with IH were included in this meta-analysis. Treatment with topical timolol alone showed a similar response rate compared to oral propranolol (risk ratio [RR] = 0.97, p = 0.63), but resulted in fewer adverse events (RR = 0.36, p = 0.002). Combined treatment with topical timolol and oral propranolol showed a favorable response rate compared to treatment with oral propranolol (RR = 1.14, p = 0.03) or topical timolol (RR = 1.36, p = 0.01) alone. Moreover, combined treatment showed similar risks of adverse events compared to oral propranolol (RR = 0.80, p = 0.24) or topical timolol (RR = 1.31, p = 0.25) alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined treatment with topical timolol and oral propranolol may be more effective than either single treatment strategy in patients with IH. Topical timolol alone conferred similar efficacy for IH compared to oral propranolol, but with less incidence of adverse events.

摘要

背景

口服普萘洛尔已成为婴儿血管瘤(IH)的一线治疗方法。然而,局部用噻吗洛尔与口服普萘洛尔联合治疗已被提出作为一种更有效的IH治疗策略。我们旨在通过荟萃分析比较局部用噻吗洛尔、口服普萘洛尔及其联合治疗IH的安全性和有效性。

方法

通过检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网和万方数据库获得相关随机对照试验(RCT)。采用随机效应模型汇总结果。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了8项RCT,共759例IH患者。单独使用局部用噻吗洛尔治疗与口服普萘洛尔相比,显示出相似的缓解率(风险比[RR]=0.97,p=0.63),但不良事件较少(RR=0.36,p=0.002)。与单独使用口服普萘洛尔(RR=1.14,p=0.03)或局部用噻吗洛尔(RR=1.36,p=0.01)治疗相比,局部用噻吗洛尔与口服普萘洛尔联合治疗显示出良好的缓解率。此外,与单独使用口服普萘洛尔(RR=0.80,p=0.24)或局部用噻吗洛尔(RR=1.31,p=0.25)相比,联合治疗显示出相似的不良事件风险。

结论

局部用噻吗洛尔与口服普萘洛尔联合治疗对IH患者可能比单一治疗策略更有效。单独使用局部用噻吗洛尔与口服普萘洛尔相比,对IH具有相似的疗效,但不良事件发生率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b45/7578425/ba02564571df/fphar-11-554847-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验