• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Basic Depression Questionnaire.基本抑郁问卷的信度和效度
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;19(3):243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in the general population: scale structure, reliability, measurement invariance and normative data: a cross-sectional survey.一般人群中的四维症状问卷(4DSQ):量表结构、信度、测量不变性及常模数据:一项横断面调查
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 15;14(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0533-4.
3
[Personality disorders in a nonclinical sample of adolescents].[青少年非临床样本中的人格障碍]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4.
4
Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in French clinical and nonclinical adults.法国临床及非临床成年人中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的心理测量特性
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2011 Oct;59(5):327-40. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2011.03.061. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
5
The Swedish version of the Insomnia Severity Index: Factor structure analysis and psychometric properties in chronic pain patients.失眠严重程度指数瑞典语版本:慢性疼痛患者的因子结构分析及心理测量学特性
Scand J Pain. 2015 Oct 1;9(1):22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.06.001.
6
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
7
Psychometric properties of the Danish Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with cardiac disease: results from the DenHeart survey.丹麦心脏病患者医院焦虑和抑郁量表的心理测量特性:DenHeart 调查结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jan 7;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1264-0.
8
Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a valid measure in a general population 65-80 years old? A psychometric evaluation study.医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)对65至80岁普通人群是否为有效测量工具?一项心理测量学评估研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 4;15(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0759-9.
9
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms.土耳其版患者健康问卷躯体、焦虑和抑郁症状的心理测量特性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;53(5):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
10
Psychometric properties of the Ruminative Response Scale-short form in a clinical sample of patients with major depressive disorder.反刍反应量表简版在重度抑郁症患者临床样本中的心理测量学特性。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 May 12;11:929-937. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S125730. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-Related, Social and Cognitive Factors Explaining Gambling Addiction.解释赌博成瘾的健康相关、社会和认知因素。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 30;11(19):2657. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192657.
2
Measurement Invariance across Sexual Orientation for Measures of Sexual Attitudes.性态度测量在性取向上的不变性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 19;20(3):1820. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031820.
3
Network and Exploratory Factorial Analysis of the Depression Clinical Evaluation Test.抑郁临床评估测试的网络和探索性因子分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 30;19(17):10788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710788.
4
Content Validity through Expert Judgment for the Depression Clinical Evaluation Test.通过专家判断评估抑郁临床评估测试的内容效度。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2022 May-Aug;22(2):100292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100292. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
5
Adaptation to Change Questionnaire for Nurses: Validation and New Needs in the Context of COVID-19.护士适应变化问卷:COVID-19背景下的效度验证及新需求
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 20;9(12):1762. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121762.
6
Depression screening and treatment among uninsured populations in Primary Care.基层医疗中未参保人群的抑郁症筛查与治疗。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2021 Sep-Dec;21(3):100241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2021.100241. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
7
Measuring stress in clinical and nonclinical subjects using a German adaptation of the Perceived Stress Scale.使用德国版的感知压力量表测量临床和非临床受试者的压力。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2020 May-Aug;20(2):173-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 May 22.
8
Validation of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire in adults with a same-sex partner.同性伴侣成年人性满意度问卷人际交流模型的验证
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2020 May-Aug;20(2):140-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
[Ten steps for test development].[测试开发的十个步骤]
Psicothema. 2019 Feb;31(1):7-16. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2018.291.
2
Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders.《国际疾病分类第11版》中精神、行为和神经发育障碍分类的创新与变化。
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):3-19. doi: 10.1002/wps.20611.
3
Cognitive factors associated with depression and anxiety in adolescents: A two-year longitudinal study.青少年抑郁和焦虑相关的认知因素:一项为期两年的纵向研究。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018 Sep-Dec;18(3):227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
Age of anxiety and depression revisited: A meta-analysis of two European community samples (1964-2015).重温焦虑与抑郁的年龄问题:对两个欧洲社区样本(1964 - 2015年)的荟萃分析
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018 May-Aug;18(2):102-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
5
Positive mental health moderates the association between depression and suicide ideation: A longitudinal study.积极的心理健康调节抑郁与自杀意念之间的关联:一项纵向研究。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018 Jan-Apr;18(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
6
Factorial invariance and norms of the 30-item shortened-version of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-30).30 项修订版儿童焦虑抑郁量表(RCADS-30)缩短版的因子不变性和常模。
Psicothema. 2018 May;30(2):232-237. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2017.276.
7
Differential Item Functioning: Beyond validity evidence based on internal structure.项目区分度:超越基于内部结构的效度证据。
Psicothema. 2018 Feb;30(1):104-109. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2017.183.
8
The cross-national structure of mental disorders: results from the World Mental Health Surveys.精神障碍的跨国结构:来自世界精神卫生调查的结果。
Psychol Med. 2018 Sep;48(12):2073-2084. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717003610. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
9
Anxiety and depression: toward overlapping and distinctive features.焦虑与抑郁:走向重叠与独特特征
Cogn Emot. 2018 Nov;32(7):1391-1400. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1330255. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
10
Depressive symptomatology and grief in Spanish women who have suffered a perinatal loss.遭受围产期丧亲之痛的西班牙女性的抑郁症状与悲痛情绪
Psicothema. 2017 Feb;29(1):43-48. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.151.

基本抑郁问卷的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of the Basic Depression Questionnaire.

作者信息

Guillot-Valdés María, Guillén-Riquelme Alejandro, Buela-Casal Gualberto

机构信息

Universidad de La Laguna, Spain.

Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center, Universidad de Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;19(3):243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.07.002
PMID:33767735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7969818/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Depressive disorders have a high prevalence around the world. They present a great comorbidity with other disorders like anxiety, thereby making a differential diagnosis very difficult. The Basic Depression Questionnaire was designed to palliate this issue by isolating specific depression symptoms. Our aim is to study the reliability, factorial structure, and differential item functioning of this questionnaire.

METHOD

The sample consisted of 1,397 adults without psychological problems (  = 29.76,  = 11.25, 64.78% women) who completed the CBD.

RESULTS

We observed that none of the items presented differential functioning. A monofactorial structure was established. In this model a good fit was obtained by confirmatory factor analysis and a strict invariance by sex. The ordinal alpha was used to check the reliability and it fetched an index of .95.

CONCLUSIONS

The Basic Depression Questionnaire has adequate psychometric properties. The absence of differential item functioning and the invariance by sex are guarantees of an adequate use to diagnose depression for men and women. So, its clinical use can help to differentiate between the specific diagnoses for depressive disorders and anxiety disorders.

摘要

未标注

抑郁症在全球范围内具有较高的患病率。它与焦虑症等其他疾病存在高度共病性,因此进行鉴别诊断非常困难。基本抑郁问卷旨在通过分离特定的抑郁症状来缓解这一问题。我们的目的是研究该问卷的信度、因子结构和项目功能差异。

方法

样本包括1397名无心理问题的成年人(平均年龄=29.76岁,标准差=11.25岁,64.78%为女性),他们完成了基本抑郁问卷(CBD)。

结果

我们观察到所有项目均未呈现功能差异。建立了单因素结构。在该模型中,通过验证性因子分析获得了良好的拟合度,且按性别具有严格不变性。使用顺序α系数来检验信度,其得出的指数为0.95。

结论

基本抑郁问卷具有足够的心理测量学特性。项目功能无差异以及按性别不变性保证了其在诊断男性和女性抑郁症时的充分适用性。因此,其临床应用有助于区分抑郁症和焦虑症的具体诊断。