J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Mar 1;28(3):243-249. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0207. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
Chronic musculoskeletal disorders in the shoulder joint are often associated with myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), particularly in the upper trapezius (UT) muscle. Dry needling (DN) is a treatment of choice for myofascial pain syndrome. However, local lesions and severe postneedle soreness sometimes hamper the direct application of DN in the UT. Therefore, finding an alternative point of treatment seems useful in this regard.
To compare the efficacy of UT versus infraspinatus (ISP) DN on pain and disability of subjects with shoulder pain. The authors hypothesized that ISP DN could be as effective as the direct application of DN in UT MTrP.
Single-blind randomized clinical trial.
Sports medicine physical therapy clinic.
A total of 40 overhead athletes (age = 36 [16] y; 20 females and 20 males) with unilateral shoulder impingement syndrome were randomly assigned to the UT DN (n = 21) and ISP DN (n = 19) groups.
An acupuncture needle was directly inserted into the trigger point of UT muscle in the UT DN group and of ISP muscle in the ISP DN group. DN was applied in 3 sessions (2-day interval between each sessions) for each group.
Pain intensity (visual analog scale), pain pressure threshold, and disability in the arm, shoulder, and hand were assessed before and after the interventions.
Pain and disability decreased significantly in both groups (P < .001) and pain pressure threshold increased significantly only in the ISP group (P = .02). However, none of the outcome measures showed a significant intergroup difference after treatments (P > .05).
Application of DN for active MTrPs in the ISP can be as effective as direct DN of active MTrPs in the UT in improving pain and disability in athletes with shoulder pain, and may be preferred due to greater patient comfort in comparison with direct UT needling.
肩部慢性肌肉骨骼疾病常与肌筋膜触发点(MTrPs)有关,尤其是在上斜方肌(UT)肌肉中。干针(DN)是肌筋膜疼痛综合征的首选治疗方法。然而,局部病变和严重的针刺后疼痛有时会妨碍 UT 中 DN 的直接应用。因此,在这方面寻找替代治疗点似乎很有用。
比较 UT 与肩胛下肌(ISP)DN 治疗肩部疼痛患者疼痛和残疾的效果。作者假设 ISP DN 可与 UT MTrP 直接应用 DN 一样有效。
单盲随机临床试验。
运动医学物理治疗诊所。
共有 40 名上肢运动员(年龄=36[16]岁;女性 20 名,男性 20 名),患有单侧肩峰下撞击综合征,随机分为 UT DN(n=21)和 ISP DN(n=19)组。
将针灸针直接插入 UT 肌肉的触发点在 UT DN 组和 ISP DN 组的 ISP 肌肉中。每组进行 3 次 DN 治疗(每次治疗之间间隔 2 天)。
干预前后疼痛强度(视觉模拟评分)、疼痛压力阈值和手臂、肩部和手部的残疾程度。
两组疼痛和残疾均显著减轻(P<0.001),仅 ISP 组疼痛压力阈值显著升高(P=0.02)。然而,治疗后各项结果均无显著组间差异(P>0.05)。
在肩部疼痛运动员中,应用 DN 治疗活动性 ISP MTrPs 与直接 DN 治疗活动性 UT MTrPs 一样有效,可以改善疼痛和残疾,并且由于与直接 UT 针刺相比,患者舒适度更高,因此可能更受欢迎。