Lescano Jesús, Quevedo Miryam, Villalobos Marina, Gavidia Cesar M
Laboratory of Animal Anatomy and Wildlife, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
Department of Mammalogy, Centro de Ornitología y Biodiversidad, Lima, Peru.
Vet Clin Pathol. 2018 Mar;47(1):29-37. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12568. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
Hematologic and serum biochemical reference values obtained from captive or free-ranging wildlife populations may not be comparable as there can be significant variations due to preanalytic and analytic differences, including methods of capture and restraint, overall management in captivity including diet and composition of animal groups, and analytic methods being used. Hematology and serum biochemistry have never been studied in captive or free-ranging populations of Sechuran foxes (Lycalopex sechurae).
The purposes of the study were to determine hematologic and serum biochemical RI in Sechuran foxes and to explore differences in these variables related to sex and overall life circumstances.
Blood samples were obtained from 15 free-ranging and 15 captive Sechuran foxes. Hematology variables were assessed by blood smear examination and automated analyzer methodology. Serum biochemical analysis was performed by automated analyzer methodology. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. Data obtained from free-ranging and captive groups were statistically compared and RIs were calculated.
Captive Sechuran foxes had significantly (P < .05) higher MCH, MCHC, and eosinophil counts and significantly lower band neutrophil counts than free-ranging foxes. Free-ranging Sechuran foxes had significantly (P < .05) higher serum lipase and globulins and significantly lower albumin, total bilirubin, and indirect bilirubin than captive foxes.
These findings suggest that there are hematologic and serum biochemical differences between captive and free-ranging Sechuran fox populations. Hence, such differences should be considered when using these variables to assess the health status of this species.
从圈养或自由放养的野生动物种群中获得的血液学和血清生化参考值可能不可比,因为由于分析前和分析差异,包括捕获和约束方法、圈养中的整体管理(包括饮食和动物群体组成)以及所使用的分析方法,可能存在显著差异。从未对塞楚拉狐(Lycalopex sechurae)的圈养或自由放养种群进行过血液学和血清生化研究。
本研究的目的是确定塞楚拉狐的血液学和血清生化参考区间,并探讨这些变量与性别和整体生活环境相关的差异。
从15只自由放养和15只圈养塞楚拉狐中采集血样。通过血涂片检查和自动分析仪方法评估血液学变量。通过自动分析仪方法进行血清生化分析。计算每个变量的描述性统计量。对自由放养组和圈养组获得的数据进行统计学比较并计算参考区间。
与自由放养的狐狸相比,圈养的塞楚拉狐的平均红细胞血红蛋白含量(MCH)、平均红细胞血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)和嗜酸性粒细胞计数显著更高(P < 0.05),而带状中性粒细胞计数显著更低。与圈养狐狸相比,自由放养的塞楚拉狐的血清脂肪酶和球蛋白显著更高(P < 0.05),而白蛋白、总胆红素和间接胆红素显著更低。
这些发现表明,圈养和自由放养的塞楚拉狐种群之间存在血液学和血清生化差异。因此,在使用这些变量评估该物种的健康状况时应考虑这些差异。