1Department of Population Health Sciences,University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison,Wisconsin.
2School of Medicine and Public Health,University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison,Wisconsin.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;39(2):177-185. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.286. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
OBJECTIVE To identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of a Clostridium difficile screening intervention among bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients and to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the intervention on the rate of hospital-onset C. difficile infection (HO-CDI). DESIGN Before-and-after trial SETTING A 505-bed tertiary-care medical center PARTICIPANTS All 5,357 patients admitted to the BMT and general medicine wards from January 2014 to February 2017 were included in the study. Interview participants included 3 physicians, 4 nurses, and 4 administrators. INTERVENTION All BMT patients were screened within 48 hours of admission. Colonized patients, as defined by a C. difficile-positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) stool result, were placed under contact precautions for the duration of their hospital stay. METHODS Interview responses were coded according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety conceptual framework. We compared pre- and postintervention HO-CDI rates on BMT and general internal medicine units using time-series analysis. RESULTS Stakeholder engagement, at both the person and organizational level, facilitates standardization and optimization of intervention protocols. While the screening intervention was generally well received, tools and technology were sources of concern. The mean incidence of HO-CDI decreased on the BMT service postintervention (P<.0001). However, the effect of the change in the trend postintervention was not significantly different on BMT compared to the control wards (P=.93). CONCLUSIONS We report the first mixed-methods study to evaluate a C. difficile screening intervention among the BMT population. The positive nature by which the intervention was received by front-line clinical staff, laboratory staff, and administrators is promising for future implementation studies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:177-185.
确定在骨髓移植(BMT)患者中实施艰难梭菌筛查干预的促进因素和障碍,并评估该干预措施对医院获得性艰难梭菌感染(HO-CDI)发生率的临床效果。
前后对照试验
一家拥有 505 张床位的三级保健医疗中心
所有于 2014 年 1 月至 2017 年 2 月期间入住 BMT 和普通内科病房的 5357 名患者均纳入本研究。访谈参与者包括 3 名医生、4 名护士和 4 名管理人员。
所有 BMT 患者均在入院后 48 小时内接受筛查。将聚合酶链反应(PCR)粪便检测结果阳性的定植患者在整个住院期间实施接触预防措施。
访谈结果按照患者安全系统工程倡议概念框架进行编码。我们使用时间序列分析比较了干预前后 BMT 和普通内科病房的 HO-CDI 发生率。
在个人和组织层面的利益相关者参与促进了干预方案的标准化和优化。虽然该筛查干预措施总体上得到了很好的认可,但工具和技术仍是关注的问题。干预后,BMT 服务的 HO-CDI 发生率降低(P<0.0001)。然而,干预后趋势变化的效果在 BMT 与对照病房之间没有显著差异(P=0.93)。
我们报告了首例针对 BMT 人群开展艰难梭菌筛查干预的混合方法研究。一线临床工作人员、实验室工作人员和管理人员对干预措施的积极接受为未来的实施研究提供了希望。感染控制与医院流行病学 2018;39:177-185。