• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多基因标志物面板与乳腺癌治疗:使用模式与对临床决策的影响。

Multigene Signature Panels and Breast Cancer Therapy: Patterns of Use and Impact on Clinical Decision Making.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):406-412.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.043. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.043
PMID:29366844
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A growing body of evidence supports the use of multigene signature panels (MSPs) in predicting recurrence risk in patients with invasive breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate trends in MSP use over time and the effect of MSPs on administration of postoperative chemotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

The National Cancer Database was queried for all women with invasive breast cancer who underwent resection between 2011 and 2014 and had information about performance of an MSP, hormone receptor status, and receipt of chemotherapy. Multigene signature panel use over time was evaluated, and patterns of use of Oncotype DX (ODX) and MammaPrint (MP) were compared.

RESULTS

In a total of 476,128 patients, an MSP was obtained in 153,782 (30.2%). Multigene signature panel use increased over time and was associated with a decreased rate of chemotherapy administration (24.6% MSP vs 37.2% no MSP; p < 0.001). Oncotype DX remained the most common MSP used throughout the study period. Oncotype DX was used more commonly in stage I disease than MP, and MP was used more commonly in stage II and III disease. MammaPrint was more commonly used in hormone receptor-negative patients, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive patients, and patients with positive lymph nodes. Postoperative chemotherapy was administered to a higher proportion of patients assessed with MP than with ODX (41.3% vs 23.4%, respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of MSPs among patients with breast cancer has increased over time and is associated with a decreased use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Oncotype DX continues to be the most widely used MSP, although MP use has increased over time. Future studies are warranted to determine the optimal use of these MSPs in risk assessment and postoperative decision making.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据支持使用多基因标志面板(MSP)来预测浸润性乳腺癌患者的复发风险。本研究旨在评估 MSP 使用随时间的变化趋势,以及 MSP 对术后化疗的影响。

研究设计

国家癌症数据库检索了 2011 年至 2014 年间接受切除术的所有浸润性乳腺癌女性患者,这些患者的信息包括 MSP 的检测、激素受体状态和化疗的使用情况。评估了 MSP 使用随时间的变化,并比较了 Oncotype DX(ODX)和 MammaPrint(MP)的使用模式。

结果

在总共 476128 名患者中,153782 名(30.2%)获得了 MSP。MSP 的使用随着时间的推移而增加,与化疗的使用率降低有关(24.6% MSP 比 37.2% 无 MSP;p < 0.001)。ODX 一直是整个研究期间最常用的 MSP。在 I 期疾病中,ODX 的使用比 MP 更常见,而在 II 期和 III 期疾病中,MP 的使用更为常见。MP 在激素受体阴性、人类表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性和淋巴结阳性的患者中更为常见。与 ODX 相比,MP 评估后接受术后化疗的患者比例更高(分别为 41.3%和 23.4%;p < 0.001)。

结论

乳腺癌患者 MSP 的使用随着时间的推移而增加,与辅助化疗的使用率降低有关。ODX 仍然是最广泛使用的 MSP,尽管 MP 的使用随着时间的推移而增加。需要进一步研究来确定这些 MSP 在风险评估和术后决策中的最佳使用。

相似文献

1
Multigene Signature Panels and Breast Cancer Therapy: Patterns of Use and Impact on Clinical Decision Making.多基因标志物面板与乳腺癌治疗:使用模式与对临床决策的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):406-412.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.043. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
Evaluating patterns of utilization of gene signature panels and impact on treatment patterns in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.评估基因特征面板的利用模式及其对乳腺导管原位癌患者治疗模式的影响。
Surgery. 2019 Oct;166(4):509-514. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.044. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
3
Impact of Genomic Assay Testing and Clinical Factors on Chemotherapy Use After Implementation of Standardized Testing Criteria.基于基因组检测与临床因素对实施标准化检测标准后化疗应用的影响
Oncologist. 2019 May;24(5):595-602. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0154. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
4
The effect of Oncotype DX on adjuvant chemotherapy treatment decisions in early breast cancer.Oncotype DX对早期乳腺癌辅助化疗治疗决策的影响。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Nov;101(8):596-601. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0096. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
5
A cost-consequence model of using the 21-gene assay to identify patients with early-stage node-positive breast cancer who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in the Netherlands.使用 21 基因检测来识别荷兰早期淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者中从辅助化疗中获益的患者的成本-后果模型。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):445-454. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2324612. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
6
Initial experience with the Oncotype DX assay in decision-making for adjuvant therapy of early oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in Hong Kong.香港应用Oncotype DX检测辅助早期雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌治疗决策的初步经验。
Hong Kong Med J. 2014 Oct;20(5):401-6. doi: 10.12809/hkmj134140. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
7
Impact of Oncotype DX breast Recurrence Score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy use in early breast cancer: Real world experience in Greater Manchester, UK.Oncotype DX乳腺复发评分检测对早期乳腺癌辅助化疗使用的影响:英国大曼彻斯特地区的真实世界经验
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 May;43(5):931-937. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.010. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
8
Role of Patient and Disease Factors in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Decision Making for Early-Stage, Operable Breast Cancer: Update of the ASCO Endorsement of the Cancer Care Ontario Guideline.患者和疾病因素在早期可手术乳腺癌辅助全身治疗决策中的作用:ASCO 更新对加拿大安大略癌症护理指南的认可。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1965-1977. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00948. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
Budget impact analysis of gene expression tests to aid therapy decisions for breast cancer patients in Germany.用于辅助德国乳腺癌患者治疗决策的基因表达检测的预算影响分析。
Breast. 2018 Feb;37:89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
10
Patient and physician factors associated with Oncotype DX and adjuvant chemotherapy utilization for breast cancer patients in New Hampshire, 2010-2016.2010-2016 年新罕布什尔州乳腺癌患者 Oncotype DX 和辅助化疗应用的患者和医生相关因素。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Sep 3;20(1):847. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07355-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of an individualized gene expression-based signature to predict overall survival of patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.开发和验证基于个体化基因表达的签名,以预测高级别浆液性卵巢癌患者的总生存。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Oct 27;28(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01376-0.
2
PROCURE European consensus on breast cancer multigene signatures in early breast cancer management.在早期乳腺癌管理中就乳腺癌多基因检测达成欧洲共识。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023 Feb 24;9(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00510-9.
3
Machine Learning to Discern Interactive Clusters of Risk Factors for Late Recurrence of Metastatic Breast Cancer.
机器学习识别转移性乳腺癌晚期复发危险因素的交互簇
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 5;14(1):253. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010253.
4
Identification of seven-gene marker to predict the survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma using integrated multi-omics data analysis.利用整合多组学数据分析鉴定预测肺腺癌患者生存的七个基因标志物。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Feb;36(2):e24190. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24190. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
5
PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF TOPOISOMERASE 2-ALPHA AND B-MYB IN EARLY BREAST CANCER TREATED WITH ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY.辅助化疗治疗早期乳腺癌中拓扑异构酶 2-α 和 B-Myb 的预后价值。
Acta Clin Croat. 2021 Mar;60(1):16-24. doi: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.03.
6
Autophagy-Related Three-Gene Prognostic Signature for Predicting Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.用于预测食管鳞状细胞癌生存的自噬相关三基因预后特征
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 15;11:650891. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.650891. eCollection 2021.
7
Identification of a Six-Gene Signature for Predicting the Overall Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients.用于预测宫颈癌患者总生存期的六基因特征识别
Onco Targets Ther. 2021 Feb 5;14:809-822. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S276553. eCollection 2021.
8
Identification of 6 gene markers for survival prediction in osteosarcoma cases based on multi-omics analysis.基于多组学分析鉴定骨肉瘤病例生存预测的 6 个基因标志物。
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2021 Jul;246(13):1512-1523. doi: 10.1177/1535370221992015. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
9
Concordance between results of inexpensive statistical models and multigene signatures in patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer.在 ER+/HER2- 早期乳腺癌患者中,廉价统计模型的结果与多基因标志物的一致性。
Mod Pathol. 2021 Jul;34(7):1297-1309. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00743-8. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
10
A New Prognostic Risk Model Based on PPAR Pathway-Related Genes in Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma.一种基于PPAR通路相关基因的肾透明细胞癌新预后风险模型
PPAR Res. 2020 Sep 22;2020:6937475. doi: 10.1155/2020/6937475. eCollection 2020.