Laanisto Lauri, Niinemets Ülo
Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia.
Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2015 May;24(5):571-580. doi: 10.1111/geb.12288.
According to traditional ecophysiological theories stress tolerance of plants is predominately determined by universal physiochemical constraints. Plant acclimation to environmental stress therefore compromises plant performance under a different stress, hindering successful toleration of several abiotic stress factors simultaneously. Yet, recent studies have shown that these trade-offs are less exclusive than postulated so far, leaving more wiggle room for gaining polytolerance through adaptations We tested whether the polytolerance to shade and drought depends on cold and waterlogging tolerances - hypothesizing that polytolerance patterns in different species groups (angiosperms vs. gymnosperms; deciduous vs. evergreen; species originating from North America, Europe and East Asia) depend on the length of the vegetation period and species's dormancy through limiting the duration of favourable growing season.
Northern hemisphere.
Our study analyzed four main abiotic stress factors - shade, drought, cold and waterlogging stress - for 806 Northern hemisphere woody species using cross-calibrated tolerance rankings. The importance of trade-offs among species ecological potentials was evaluated using the species-specific estimates of polytolerance to chosen factors.
We found that both cold and waterlogging tolerance are negatively related to species' capabilities of simultaneously tolerating low light and water conditions. While this pattern was different in angiosperms and gymnosperms, species region of origin and leaf type had no effect on this relationship.
Our results demonstrate that adaptation to different abiotic stress factors in woody plants is highly complex. Vegetation period length and dormancy are the key factors explaining why woody plants are less capable of tolerating both shade and drought in habitats where vegetation period is relatively short and water table high. While dormancy enables angiosperms to more successfully face additional stress factors besides shade and drought, gymnosperms have lower polytolerance, but are better tolerators of shade and drought when other environmental factors are favorable.
根据传统的生态生理学理论,植物的胁迫耐受性主要由普遍的物理化学限制因素决定。因此,植物对环境胁迫的适应会损害其在不同胁迫下的表现,阻碍其同时成功耐受多种非生物胁迫因素。然而,最近的研究表明,这些权衡并不像迄今为止所假设的那样具有排他性,通过适应获得多耐受性存在更多的灵活空间。我们测试了对遮荫和干旱的多耐受性是否取决于耐寒性和耐涝性——假设不同物种组(被子植物与裸子植物;落叶植物与常绿植物;原产于北美、欧洲和东亚的物种)的多耐受性模式取决于植被期的长度和物种的休眠期,因为它们限制了有利生长季节的持续时间。
北半球。
我们的研究使用交叉校准的耐受性排名,分析了北半球806种木本植物的四种主要非生物胁迫因素——遮荫、干旱、寒冷和涝渍胁迫。利用对选定因素的物种特异性多耐受性估计值,评估了物种生态潜力之间权衡的重要性。
我们发现耐寒性和耐涝性均与物种同时耐受低光照和水分条件的能力呈负相关。虽然这种模式在被子植物和裸子植物中有所不同,但物种的起源地区和叶型对这种关系没有影响。
我们的结果表明,木本植物对不同非生物胁迫因素的适应非常复杂。植被期长度和休眠是解释为什么在植被期相对较短且地下水位较高的栖息地中,木本植物较难同时耐受遮荫和干旱的关键因素。虽然休眠使被子植物能够更成功地应对除遮荫和干旱之外的其他胁迫因素,但裸子植物的多耐受性较低,但在其他环境因素有利时,对遮荫和干旱的耐受性更好。