Suppr超能文献

次最大运动期间心输出量的个体差异是否能解释运动肌肉氧合和主观用力程度评分的差异?

Do interindividual differences in cardiac output during submaximal exercise explain differences in exercising muscle oxygenation and ratings of perceived exertion?

作者信息

Bentley Robert F, Jones Joshua H, Hirai Daniel M, Zelt Joel T, Giles Matthew D, Raleigh James P, Quadrilatero Joe, Gurd Brendon J, Neder J Alberto, Tschakovsky Michael E

机构信息

Human Vascular Control Laboratory, School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Laboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology, Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Physiol Rep. 2018 Jan;6(2). doi: 10.14814/phy2.13570.

Abstract

Considerable interindividual differences in the Q˙-V˙O2 relationship during exercise have been documented but implications for submaximal exercise tolerance have not been considered. We tested the hypothesis that these interindividual differences were associated with differences in exercising muscle deoxygenation and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) across a range of submaximal exercise intensities. A total of 31 (21 ± 3 years) healthy recreationally active males performed an incremental exercise test to exhaustion 24 h following a resting muscle biopsy. Cardiac output (Q˙ L/min; inert gas rebreathe), oxygen uptake (V˙O2 L/min; breath-by-breath pulmonary gas exchange), quadriceps saturation (near infrared spectroscopy) and exercise tolerance (6-20; Borg Scale RPE) were measured. The Q˙-V˙O2 relationship from 40 to 160 W was used to partition individuals post hoc into higher (n = 10; 6.3 ± 0.4) versus lower (n = 10; 3.7 ± 0.4, P < 0.001) responders. The Q˙-V˙O2 difference between responder types was not explained by arterial oxygen content differences (P = 0.5) or peripheral skeletal muscle characteristics (P from 0.1 to 0.8) but was strongly associated with stroke volume (P < 0.05). Despite considerable Q˙-V˙O2 difference between groups, no difference in quadriceps deoxygenation was observed during exercise (all P > 0.4). Lower cardiac responders had greater leg (P = 0.027) and whole body (P = 0.03) RPE only at 185 W, but this represented a higher %peak V˙O2 in lower cardiac responders (87 ± 15% vs. 66 ± 12%, P = 0.005). Substantially lower Q˙-V˙O2 in the lower responder group did not result in altered RPE or exercising muscle deoxygenation. This suggests substantial recruitment of blood flow redistribution in the lower responder group as part of protecting matching of exercising muscle oxygen delivery to demand.

摘要

运动期间Q˙-V˙O2关系存在显著个体差异,这一点已有文献记载,但尚未考虑其对次最大运动耐力的影响。我们检验了这样一个假设:这些个体差异与一系列次最大运动强度下运动肌肉脱氧情况及主观用力程度分级(RPE)的差异有关。共有31名(21±3岁)健康的、有休闲运动习惯的男性在静息肌肉活检24小时后进行递增运动试验直至力竭。测量了心输出量(Q˙,L/分钟;惰性气体再呼吸法)、摄氧量(V˙O2,L/分钟;逐次呼吸肺气体交换法)、股四头肌饱和度(近红外光谱法)和运动耐力(6 - 20;Borg量表RPE)。利用40至160瓦的Q˙-V˙O2关系,事后将个体分为高反应者(n = 10;6.3±0.4)和低反应者(n = 10;3.7±0.4,P < 0.001)。反应者类型之间的Q˙-V˙O2差异无法用动脉血氧含量差异(P = 0.5)或外周骨骼肌特征(P值从0.1至0.8)来解释,但与每搏输出量密切相关(P < 0.05)。尽管两组之间Q˙-V˙O2存在显著差异,但运动期间股四头肌脱氧情况未观察到差异(所有P > 0.4)。低心输出量反应者仅在185瓦时腿部(P = 0.027)和全身(P = 0.03)的RPE更高,但这在低心输出量反应者中代表更高的%峰值V˙O2(87±15%对66±12%,P = 0.005)。低反应者组中显著更低的Q˙-V˙O2并未导致RPE改变或运动肌肉脱氧情况改变。这表明低反应者组大量募集了血流再分配,作为保护运动肌肉氧输送与需求匹配的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f97/5789726/aa5b053dda0e/PHY2-6-e13570-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验