Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, The Rayne Institute, St. Thomas' Hospital , London , United Kingdom.
Inria, Paris-Saclay University, Palaiseau, France.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Sep 1;125(3):889-900. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00580.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
Ventricular volumetric ejection fraction (VV EF) is often normal in patients with single ventricle circulations despite them experiencing symptoms related to circulatory failure. We sought to determine if kinetic energy (KE) could be a better marker of ventricular performance. KE was prospectively quantified using four-dimensional flow MRI in 41 patients with a single ventricle circulation (aged 0.5-28 yr) and compared with 43 healthy volunteers (aged 1.5-62 yr) and 14 patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (aged 28-79 yr). Intraventricular end-diastolic blood was tracked through systole and divided into ejected and residual blood components. Two ejection fraction (EF) metrics were devised based on the KE of the ejected component over the total of both the ejected and residual components using 1) instantaneous peak KE to assess KE EF or 2) summating individual peak particle energy (PE) to assess PE EF. KE EF and PE EF had a smaller range than VV EF in healthy subjects (97.9 ± 0.8 vs. 97.3 ± 0.8 vs. 60.1 ± 5.2%). LV dysfunction caused a fall in KE EF ( P = 0.01) and PE EF ( P = 0.0001). VV EF in healthy LVs and single ventricle hearts was equivalent; however, KE EF and PE EF were lower ( P < 0.001) with a wider range indicating a spectrum of severity. Those reporting the greatest symptomatic impairment (New York Heart Association II) had lower PE EF than asymptomatic subjects ( P = 0.0067). KE metrics are markers of healthy cardiac function. PE EF may be useful in grading dysfunction. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Kinetic energy (KE) represents the useful work of the heart in ejecting blood. This article details the utilization of KE indexes to assess cardiac function in health and a variety of pathophysiological conditions. KE ejection fraction and particle energy ejection fraction (PE EF) showed a narrow range in health and a lower wider range in disease representing a spectrum of severity. PE EF was altered by functional status potentially offering the opportunity to grade dysfunction.
心室容积射血分数(VV EF)在患有单心室循环的患者中通常正常,尽管他们有与循环衰竭相关的症状。我们试图确定动能(KE)是否可以成为更好的心室功能指标。使用四维血流 MRI 前瞻性地量化了 41 例单心室循环患者(年龄 0.5-28 岁)和 43 名健康志愿者(年龄 1.5-62 岁)以及 14 例左心室(LV)功能障碍患者(年龄 28-79 岁)的 KE。通过收缩跟踪心室舒张末期的血液,并将其分为射血和残余血液成分。基于射出成分的 KE 相对于射出和残余成分的总和,设计了两种射血分数(EF)指标:1)瞬时峰值 KE 评估 KE EF 或 2)加总单个峰值粒子能量(PE)评估 PE EF。KE EF 和 PE EF 的范围比健康受试者的 VV EF 小(97.9±0.8 vs. 97.3±0.8 vs. 60.1±5.2%)。LV 功能障碍导致 KE EF(P=0.01)和 PE EF(P=0.0001)下降。健康 LV 和单心室心脏的 VV EF 是等效的;然而,KE EF 和 PE EF 较低(P<0.001),范围较宽,表明严重程度的范围较广。报告最大症状损害(纽约心脏协会 II)的患者的 PE EF 低于无症状患者(P=0.0067)。KE 指标是心脏健康功能的标志物。PE EF 可能有助于分级功能障碍。新内容和值得注意的内容:动能(KE)代表心脏射出血液的有用功。本文详细介绍了利用 KE 指标评估健康和各种病理生理条件下的心脏功能。KE 射血分数和粒子能量射血分数(PE EF)在健康状态下范围较窄,在疾病状态下范围较宽,代表严重程度的范围较广。PE EF 受功能状态的影响,可能有机会分级功能障碍。