Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois.
Retina. 2018 Sep;38 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S125-S133. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002036.
To determine whether 1-year visual and anatomical results after surgery combining pars plana vitrectomy, Boston keratoprosthesis, and a glaucoma drainage device as needed are similar, better, or worse than Boston keratoprosthesis initial implantation alone.
We performed a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing Boston keratoprosthesis at our institution. Visual acuity outcomes, anatomical results, and complication rates of patients undergoing combination surgery (including pars plana vitrectomy and a posterior glaucoma drainage device) were compared with those undergoing keratoprosthesis placement alone.
There were 70 eyes in the keratoprosthesis alone group and 55 eyes in the keratoprosthesis with pars plana vitrectomy group. Mean follow-up durations were 54.67 months in the keratoprosthesis alone group and 48.41 months in the combination group. Baseline mean Snellen equivalent visual acuities were worse for the combination group compared with the keratoprosthesis alone group (P = 0.027). Visual acuities improved postoperatively by 1 month after keratoprosthesis implantation for both groups and improved three or more lines of Snellen acuity in the majority of eyes for both groups (≥72% by 12 months). Eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy had lower rates of de novo (P = 0.015) and significantly lower rates of secondary procedures (P = 0.002) at 1 year. One year complications rates for retroprosthetic membrane formation, retinal detachment, hypotony, cystoid macular edema, epiretinal membrane formation, endophthalmitis, and corneal melting were similar for both groups.
Compared with keratoprosthesis alone, combining keratoprosthesis with pars plana vitrectomy and a glaucoma drainage device as needed, resulted in lower rates of de novo glaucoma, lower rates of additional surgical procedures, similar visual acuity outcomes at 1 year, and did not result in higher complication rates.
比较玻璃体切除术联合波士顿角膜成形术和必要时的青光眼引流装置与单纯波士顿角膜成形术初始植入后 1 年的视力和解剖结果,以确定联合手术是否比单纯角膜成形术更优。
我们对在我院行波士顿角膜成形术的成人患者进行了回顾性研究。比较联合手术(包括玻璃体切除术和后部青光眼引流装置)患者与单纯角膜成形术患者的视力结果、解剖结果和并发症发生率。
单纯角膜成形术组 70 只眼,玻璃体切除术联合角膜成形术组 55 只眼。单纯角膜成形术组平均随访时间为 54.67 个月,联合组为 48.41 个月。联合组基线平均 Snellen 等效视力较单纯角膜成形术组差(P=0.027)。两组在角膜成形术后 1 个月视力均有所提高,大多数患者的 Snellen 视力提高了 3 行以上(12 个月时≥72%)。行玻璃体切除术的眼睛在 1 年内新发青光眼的发生率较低(P=0.015),继发性手术的发生率显著较低(P=0.002)。两组在 1 年时发生后发性膜形成、视网膜脱离、低眼压、囊样黄斑水肿、视网膜前膜形成、眼内炎和角膜溶解的并发症发生率相似。
与单纯角膜成形术相比,角膜成形术联合玻璃体切除术和必要时的青光眼引流装置可降低新发青光眼的发生率、降低额外手术的发生率,1 年时的视力结果相似,且不会增加并发症的发生率。