• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪感知与自我报告的情商中的性别差异:情绪敏感性假设的检验。

Gender differences in emotion perception and self-reported emotional intelligence: A test of the emotion sensitivity hypothesis.

作者信息

Fischer Agneta H, Kret Mariska E, Broekens Joost

机构信息

University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Leiden University, Department of Psychology, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0190712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190712. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0190712
PMID:29370198
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5784910/
Abstract

Previous meta-analyses and reviews on gender differences in emotion recognition have shown a small to moderate female advantage. However, inconsistent evidence from recent studies has raised questions regarding the implications of different methodologies, stimuli, and samples. In the present research based on a community sample of more than 5000 participants, we tested the emotional sensitivity hypothesis, stating that women are more sensitive to perceive subtle, i.e. low intense or ambiguous, emotion cues. In addition, we included a self-report emotional intelligence test in order to examine any discrepancy between self-perceptions and actual performance for both men and women. We used a wide range of stimuli and models, displaying six different emotions at two different intensity levels. In order to better tap sensitivity for subtle emotion cues, we did not use a forced choice format, but rather intensity measures of different emotions. We found no support for the emotional sensitivity account, as both genders rated the target emotions as similarly intense at both levels of stimulus intensity. Men, however, more strongly perceived non-target emotions to be present than women. In addition, we also found that the lower scores of men in self-reported EI was not related to their actual perception of target emotions, but it was to the perception of non-target emotions.

摘要

以往关于情绪识别中性别差异的荟萃分析和综述显示,女性存在小到中等程度的优势。然而,近期研究中不一致的证据引发了关于不同方法、刺激因素和样本所产生影响的问题。在本研究中,我们以一个超过5000名参与者的社区样本为基础,检验了情绪敏感性假说,该假说认为女性对察觉细微的,即低强度或模糊的情绪线索更为敏感。此外,我们纳入了一项自我报告的情商测试,以考察男性和女性在自我认知与实际表现之间是否存在差异。我们使用了广泛的刺激因素和模型,在两种不同强度水平下呈现六种不同的情绪。为了更好地挖掘对细微情绪线索的敏感性,我们没有采用强制选择的形式,而是采用了不同情绪的强度测量方法。我们没有找到支持情绪敏感性观点的证据,因为在两种刺激强度水平下,男女对目标情绪强度的评分都相似。然而,男性比女性更强烈地感觉到存在非目标情绪。此外,我们还发现,男性在自我报告的情商测试中得分较低,这与他们对目标情绪的实际感知无关,但与对非目标情绪的感知有关。

相似文献

1
Gender differences in emotion perception and self-reported emotional intelligence: A test of the emotion sensitivity hypothesis.情绪感知与自我报告的情商中的性别差异:情绪敏感性假设的检验。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0190712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190712. eCollection 2018.
2
The effect of intranasal oxytocin on perceiving and understanding emotion on the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT).鼻腔内给予催产素对梅耶-沙洛维-卡鲁索情绪智力测试(MSCEIT)中情绪感知和理解的影响。
Emotion. 2014 Feb;14(1):43-50. doi: 10.1037/a0034314. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
3
Emotional intelligence and mismatching expressive and verbal messages: a contribution to detection of deception.情商与表达性信息和言语信息的不匹配:对欺骗检测的贡献。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092570. eCollection 2014.
4
Crossmodal and incremental perception of audiovisual cues to emotional speech.对情感语音视听线索的跨模态和递增感知。
Lang Speech. 2010;53(Pt 1):3-30. doi: 10.1177/0023830909348993.
5
Self-reported emotional dysregulation but no impairment of emotional intelligence in borderline personality disorder: an explorative study.边缘型人格障碍患者自我报告的情绪失调但情商无损害:一项探索性研究。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 May;198(5):385-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181da4b4f.
6
Expression intensity, gender and facial emotion recognition: Women recognize only subtle facial emotions better than men.表情强度、性别与面部情绪识别:女性仅在识别细微面部情绪方面比男性更出色。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Nov;135(3):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
7
Exploring the relationships between trait emotional intelligence and objective socio-emotional outcomes in childhood.探索儿童期特质情绪智力与客观社会情感结果之间的关系。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Jun;79(Pt 2):259-72. doi: 10.1348/000709908X368848. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
8
Perceived emotion genuineness: normative ratings for popular facial expression stimuli and the development of perceived-as-genuine and perceived-as-fake sets.感知到的情绪真实性:流行面部表情刺激的规范评分以及真实感和虚假感集合的发展
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1539-1562. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0813-2.
9
Validating emotional attention regulation as a component of emotional intelligence: A Stroop approach to individual differences in tuning in to and out of nonverbal cues.验证情绪注意力调节作为情商的一个组成部分:一种用于研究在关注和忽略非语言线索方面个体差异的斯特鲁普方法。
Emotion. 2017 Mar;17(2):348-358. doi: 10.1037/emo0000145. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
10
Facial emotion perception by intensity in children and adolescents with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.22q11.2缺失综合征儿童和青少年基于强度的面部情绪感知
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;25(3):297-310. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0741-1. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in compulsive alcohol drinking phenotypes: implications for decision-making and social behavior in a preclinical model.强迫性饮酒表型中的性别差异:对临床前模型中决策和社会行为的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s00213-025-06895-8.
2
Emotional Responses to Bed Bug Encounters: Effects of Sex, Proximity, and Educational Intervention on Fear and Disgust Perceptions.对臭虫遭遇的情绪反应:性别、接近程度和教育干预对恐惧和厌恶认知的影响。
Insects. 2025 Jul 24;16(8):759. doi: 10.3390/insects16080759.
3
Depression and the use of conversational AI for companionship among college students: the mediating role of loneliness and the moderating effects of gender and mind perception.大学生中的抑郁与使用对话式人工智能寻求陪伴:孤独的中介作用以及性别和心理感知的调节作用
Front Public Health. 2025 May 30;13:1580826. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1580826. eCollection 2025.
4
The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and the Risk of Eating Disorders Among Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Motivation for the Use of Social Media and Moderation of Perceived Social Support.青少年情绪智力与饮食失调风险之间的关系:社交媒体使用动机的中介作用及感知社会支持的调节作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;15(4):434. doi: 10.3390/bs15040434.
5
Negative Reactions to Positive Gender Stereotypes: Different Levels of Positivity Elicit Similar Negative Reactions.对积极性别刻板印象的负面反应:不同程度的积极引发相似的负面反应。
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Mar;54(3):1181-1197. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-03069-z. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
6
Sex Differences in Processing Emotional Speech Prosody: Preliminary Findings from a Multi-Feature Oddball Study.处理情感语音韵律中的性别差异:一项多特征Oddball研究的初步发现。
Brain Sci. 2024 Nov 30;14(12):1216. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121216.
7
The more self-control, the more anxious?- A network analysis study of the relationship between self-control and psychological anxiety among Chinese university students.自我控制越强,焦虑感越高吗?——中国大学生自我控制与心理焦虑关系的网络分析研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 12;12(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02099-5.
8
Sex differences in social network addiction and emotional eating among adolescents in a Peruvian region: a cross-sectional analysis.秘鲁某地区青少年社交网络成瘾与情绪化进食的性别差异:一项横断面分析。
J Eat Disord. 2024 Oct 25;12(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01122-9.
9
Dyadic effects of perceived stress, relationship satisfaction and distress disclosure on emotional distress in colorectal cancer patients and their family caregivers: An actor-partner interdependence mediation model.感知压力、关系满意度和痛苦表露对结直肠癌患者及其家庭照顾者情绪困扰的二元效应:一个行为者-伙伴相互依赖中介模型。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Aug 29;11(10):100580. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100580. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
The role of the age and gender, and the complexity of the syntactic unit in the perception of affective emotions in voice.年龄、性别以及句法单元的复杂性在语音情感感知中的作用。
Codas. 2024 Jul 19;36(5):e20240009. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242024009en. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Ability versus vulnerability: Beliefs about men's and women's emotional behaviour.能力与脆弱性:关于男性和女性情感行为的信念
Cogn Emot. 2003 Jan;17(1):41-63. doi: 10.1080/02699930302277.
2
Validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set--Bath Intensity Variations (ADFES-BIV): A Set of Videos Expressing Low, Intermediate, and High Intensity Emotions.阿姆斯特丹动态面部表情集 - 巴斯强度变化版(ADFES - BIV)的验证:一组表达低、中、高强度情绪的视频
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 19;11(1):e0147112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147112. eCollection 2016.
3
Emotional fit with culture: a predictor of individual differences in relational well-being.文化情感契合:关系幸福感个体差异的预测指标。
Emotion. 2014 Apr;14(2):241-5. doi: 10.1037/a0035296. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
4
A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals.关于情绪信号处理中的性别差异的综述。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.022. Epub 2012 Jan 8.
5
Moving faces, looking places: validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set (ADFES).移动物体,观察位置:阿姆斯特丹动态面部表情集(ADFES)的验证。
Emotion. 2011 Aug;11(4):907-20. doi: 10.1037/a0023853.
6
Gender differences in implicit and explicit processing of emotional facial expressions as revealed by event-related theta synchronization.事件相关theta 同步揭示的情绪面部表情的内隐和外显加工中的性别差异。
Emotion. 2010 Oct;10(5):678-87. doi: 10.1037/a0019175.
7
Expression intensity, gender and facial emotion recognition: Women recognize only subtle facial emotions better than men.表情强度、性别与面部情绪识别:女性仅在识别细微面部情绪方面比男性更出色。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Nov;135(3):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
8
Emotional intelligence: an integrative meta-analysis and cascading model.情绪智力:综合元分析和层递模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):54-78. doi: 10.1037/a0017286.
9
She's emotional. He's having a bad day: attributional explanations for emotion stereotypes.她情绪化。他今天过得不顺:情绪刻板印象的归因解释。
Emotion. 2009 Oct;9(5):649-58. doi: 10.1037/a0016821.
10
Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men.女性比男性更有效地处理多感官情感表达。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(1):220-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.007.