a Food and Environmental Safety Research Group (SAMA-UV), Desertification Research Centre (CIDE, UV-CSIC-GV), Faculty of Pharmacy , University of Valencia , Burjassot , Valencia , Spain.
Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2018 Jul 4;48(4):305-316. doi: 10.1080/10408347.2018.1430555. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
The consumption of compounds that improve the human health and wellness is increasing, and as a result, the residues of these substances reach the environment or food chain. For this reason, the scientific community is looking for new analytical methods that are more accurate and can detect the greatest number of compounds in different matrices. This manuscript compares different studies in abiotic and biotic matrices, where most of them (92%) uses Liquid Chromatography to separate the compounds. For the detection, most of the studies for both matrices uses, coupled to the chromatograph, a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (50%) due to the precision to quantify the concentration of these compounds. Time of Flight (QToF) mass spectrometer is used in 24% of the manuscripts reviewed, in both matrices. It is possible to quantify the concentration of these compounds with the instrument but do not provide as high accuracy as the triple quadrupole.
人们越来越多地消费有益于人类健康和福祉的化合物,因此这些物质的残留会进入环境或食物链。出于这个原因,科学界正在寻找新的分析方法,这些方法更准确,能够检测不同基质中更多的化合物。本文比较了在非生物和生物基质中不同的研究,其中大多数(92%)使用液相色谱法来分离化合物。对于检测,大多数这两种基质的研究都使用与色谱仪联用的三重四极杆质谱仪(50%),因为其具有定量这些化合物浓度的精度。在审查的文献中,飞行时间(QToF)质谱仪在这两种基质中都有 24%被使用。该仪器可以定量这些化合物的浓度,但不如三重四极杆那样准确。