• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“这并非任何人想要的生活”——一项关于挪威积极社区治疗(ACT)服务使用者心理健康治疗体验的定性研究

"This is not a Life Anyone would want"-A Qualitative Study of Norwegian ACT Service users' Experience with Mental Health Treatment.

作者信息

Lofthus Ann-Mari, Weimand Bente M, Ruud Torleif, Rose Diana, Heiervang Kristin S

机构信息

a Akershus Universitetssykehus HF , Department of Research and Development, Division of Mental Health Services , Lorenskog , Norway.

b National Centre for knowledge through experience in mental health , Skien , Norway.

出版信息

Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Jun;39(6):519-526. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2017.1413459. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1080/01612840.2017.1413459
PMID:29370562
Abstract

We discuss Norwegian service users' experiences with community mental health treatment in general, and the interprofessional Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model in particular. To gain the right to treatment, service users have to accept certain limitations, such as medication and community treatment orders (CTOs). Seventy participants responded to five open-ended questions. In addition, eight of them participated in either focus group or interviews. A collaborative approach, using Stepwise-Deductive Induction (SDI) method was used to analyze the participants' experiences. The results showed that the treatment contributes to an experience of autonomy but also one of restriction. It provides service users with enhanced normalcy, but simultaneously a feeling of deviance. There needs to be an ongoing reflection and discussion about those paradoxes in treatment, and service users have to be involved.

摘要

我们总体上讨论了挪威服务使用者在社区心理健康治疗方面的经历,尤其关注跨专业的积极社区治疗(ACT)模式。为了获得治疗权,服务使用者必须接受某些限制,例如药物治疗和社区治疗令(CTO)。七十名参与者回答了五个开放式问题。此外,其中八人参加了焦点小组或访谈。采用逐步演绎归纳(SDI)方法的协作方式来分析参与者的经历。结果表明,治疗既带来了自主感,也带来了受限感。它为服务使用者增强了正常感,但同时也带来了偏差感。需要对治疗中的这些矛盾进行持续反思和讨论,并且必须让服务使用者参与其中。

相似文献

1
"This is not a Life Anyone would want"-A Qualitative Study of Norwegian ACT Service users' Experience with Mental Health Treatment.“这并非任何人想要的生活”——一项关于挪威积极社区治疗(ACT)服务使用者心理健康治疗体验的定性研究
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Jun;39(6):519-526. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2017.1413459. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
2
Responsibilities with conflicting priorities: a qualitative study of ACT providers' experiences with community treatment orders.职责优先级相互冲突:对社区治疗令下积极社区治疗服务提供者经历的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 18;18(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3097-7.
3
Recovery concept in a Norwegian setting to be examined by the assertive community treatment model and mixed methods.挪威的康复理念将通过积极社区治疗模式和混合方法进行检验。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(1):147-157. doi: 10.1111/inm.12304. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
4
Continuity of care as experienced by mental health service users - a qualitative study.心理健康服务使用者所体验到的连续性照护——一项质性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):763. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2719-9.
5
Shifting Practices Toward Recovery-Oriented Care Through an E-Recovery Portal in Community Mental Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study.通过社区精神卫生保健中的电子康复门户将实践转向以康复为导向的护理:一项混合方法探索性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 2;19(5):e145. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7524.
6
Increased influence and collaboration: a qualitative study of patients' experiences of community treatment orders within an assertive community treatment setting.影响力与协作的增强:对积极社区治疗环境下社区治疗令患者体验的质性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 23;15:409. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1083-x.
7
Service users' expectations of treatment and support at the Community Mental Health Centre in their recovery.服务使用者对社区心理健康中心在其康复过程中治疗与支持的期望。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Sep;31(3):505-513. doi: 10.1111/scs.12364. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
Are Users Satisfied with Assertive Community Treatment in Spite of Personal Restrictions?尽管存在个人限制,服务对象对积极社区治疗是否满意?
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):891-897. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-9994-5. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
9
Patients' experiences with coercive mental health treatment in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: a qualitative study.患者在灵活的积极社区治疗中接受强制性心理健康治疗的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05264-z.
10
"A plea for recognition" Users' experience of humiliation during mental health care.“呼吁认可”:精神卫生保健中用户的羞辱体验。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Jan-Feb;62:148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in inpatient mental health treatment and related costs before and after flexible assertive community treatment: a naturalistic observational cohort study.灵活的积极社区治疗前后住院心理健康治疗及相关费用的变化:一项自然观察队列研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06614-9.
2
Acceptability and usability of a nurse-assisted remote patient monitoring intervention for the post-hospital follow-up of patients with long-term illness: A qualitative study.护士辅助远程患者监测干预措施用于长期疾病患者出院后随访的可接受性和可用性:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Jul 27;7:100229. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100229. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Epistemic citizenship under structural siege: a meta-analysis drawing on 544 voices of service user experiences in Nordic mental health services.
结构围困下的认知公民身份:一项基于北欧心理健康服务中544名服务使用者经历的元分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 2;14:1156835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1156835. eCollection 2023.
4
Service User Experiences of How Flexible Assertive Community Treatment May Support or Inhibit Citizenship: A Qualitative Study.服务使用者对灵活的积极社区治疗如何支持或阻碍公民身份的体验:一项定性研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 8;12:727013. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727013. eCollection 2021.
5
Cooperation in the mental health treatment of patients with outpatient commitment.对门诊强制治疗患者的心理健康治疗中的合作。
SAGE Open Med. 2020 May 27;8:2050312120926410. doi: 10.1177/2050312120926410. eCollection 2020.