• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尽管存在个人限制,服务对象对积极社区治疗是否满意?

Are Users Satisfied with Assertive Community Treatment in Spite of Personal Restrictions?

作者信息

Lofthus Ann-Mari, Westerlund Heidi, Bjørgen Dagfinn, Lindstrøm Jonas Christoffer, Lauveng Arnhild, Clausen Hanne, Ruud Torleif, Heiervang Kristin Sverdvik

机构信息

Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

National Centre for Knowledge through Experience in Mental Health, Skien, Norway.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):891-897. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-9994-5. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-016-9994-5
PMID:26868646
Abstract

The purpose of this explorative study was to examine satisfaction among 70 users of 12 Norwegian Assertive Community Treatment teams. The study was carried out among a group of 70 service users, and reveals generally high levels of satisfaction with the service, with satisfaction also being high in comparison to other ACT satisfaction studies. Users under a Community Treatment Order were more satisfied, while users with an alcohol use disorder were less satisfied. Younger service users were less positive than older users. There was no difference in satisfaction between the genders. This study's positive result may reflect the ACT model's focus on user involvement, recovery and building relationships, and the fact that this service has a more holistic approach than previous services that users have experienced.

摘要

这项探索性研究的目的是调查挪威12个积极社区治疗团队的70名使用者的满意度。该研究在70名服务使用者群体中开展,结果显示,总体上对该服务的满意度较高,与其他积极社区治疗满意度研究相比,满意度也较高。处于社区治疗令之下的使用者满意度更高,而患有酒精使用障碍的使用者满意度较低。年轻的服务使用者不如年长的使用者积极。不同性别的使用者在满意度上没有差异。这项研究的积极结果可能反映了积极社区治疗模式对使用者参与、康复和建立关系的关注,以及该服务比使用者之前所体验的服务采用了更全面的方法这一事实。

相似文献

1
Are Users Satisfied with Assertive Community Treatment in Spite of Personal Restrictions?尽管存在个人限制,服务对象对积极社区治疗是否满意?
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):891-897. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-9994-5. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
2
Recovery concept in a Norwegian setting to be examined by the assertive community treatment model and mixed methods.挪威的康复理念将通过积极社区治疗模式和混合方法进行检验。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(1):147-157. doi: 10.1111/inm.12304. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
3
Happy with your care?对你得到的护理还满意吗?
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2005 Apr;12(2):173-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2004.00814.x.
4
Shifting Practices Toward Recovery-Oriented Care Through an E-Recovery Portal in Community Mental Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study.通过社区精神卫生保健中的电子康复门户将实践转向以康复为导向的护理:一项混合方法探索性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 2;19(5):e145. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7524.
5
Mental health service users' and practitioners' experiences of engagement in assertive outreach: a qualitative study.精神卫生服务使用者和从业者参与果断外展服务的体验:一项定性研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011 Nov;18(9):822-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01733.x. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
6
Increased influence and collaboration: a qualitative study of patients' experiences of community treatment orders within an assertive community treatment setting.影响力与协作的增强:对积极社区治疗环境下社区治疗令患者体验的质性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 23;15:409. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1083-x.
7
"This is not a Life Anyone would want"-A Qualitative Study of Norwegian ACT Service users' Experience with Mental Health Treatment.“这并非任何人想要的生活”——一项关于挪威积极社区治疗(ACT)服务使用者心理健康治疗体验的定性研究
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Jun;39(6):519-526. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2017.1413459. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
8
The REACT study: randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment in north London.REACT研究:伦敦北部积极社区治疗的随机评估。
BMJ. 2006 Apr 8;332(7545):815-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38773.518322.7C. Epub 2006 Mar 16.
9
Successful engagement: a mixed methods study of the approaches of assertive community treatment and community mental health teams in the REACT trial.成功参与:关于REACT试验中积极社区治疗和社区精神卫生团队方法的混合方法研究
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;44(7):532-40. doi: 10.1007/s00127-008-0472-4. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
10
Families in Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Teams in Norway: A Cross-Sectional Study on Relatives' Experiences of Involvement and Alienation.挪威积极社区治疗(ACT)团队中的家庭:一项关于亲属参与感和疏离感体验的横断面研究
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Jul;54(5):686-697. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0207-7. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-based Mental Health Services in Norway.挪威的社区心理健康服务。
Consort Psychiatr. 2021 Mar 20;2(1):47-54. doi: 10.17816/CP43.
2
Patients' experiences with coercive mental health treatment in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: a qualitative study.患者在灵活的积极社区治疗中接受强制性心理健康治疗的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05264-z.
3
How do patients and families evaluate attitude of psychiatrists in Japan?: quantitative content analysis of open-ended items of patient responses from a large-scale questionnaire survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations Between Quality of Life and Functioning in an Assertive Community Treatment Population.积极社区治疗人群的生活质量与功能之间的关联
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Nov;66(11):1249-52. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400376. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
2
"Life on hold": a qualitative study of patient experiences with outpatient commitment in two norwegian counties.“生活暂停”:对挪威两个郡门诊强制治疗患者经历的定性研究
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Mar;36(3):209-16. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.955933.
3
Same description, different values. How service users and providers define patient and public involvement in health care.
患者和家属如何评价日本精神科医生的态度?:一项大规模问卷调查中患者回答的开放性项目的定量内容分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 14;23(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04732-w.
4
Carer involvement in the assessment of personal recovery: A naturalistic study of assertive community treatment in Norway.护理人员参与个人康复评估:挪威积极社区治疗的一项自然主义研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 27;14:1135135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1135135. eCollection 2023.
5
A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care.挪威语数字化版患者满意度问卷 8 版:在精神科门诊患者中的因子有效性和内部信度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04281-8.
6
Models of Care of Schizophrenia in the Community-An International Perspective.社区精神分裂症护理模式——国际视角。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022 Mar;24(3):195-202. doi: 10.1007/s11920-022-01329-0. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
Relationship between satisfaction with mental health services, personal recovery and quality of life among service users with psychosis: a cross-sectional study.精神病服务使用者对心理健康服务的满意度、个人康复与生活质量之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 8;21(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06409-0.
8
Model fidelity and team members' experiences of assertive community treatment in Norway: a sequential mixed-methods study.挪威积极社区治疗的模型保真度与团队成员的经验:一项序列混合方法研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Oct 16;13:65. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0321-8. eCollection 2019.
9
How clinicians make decisions about CTOs in ACT: a qualitative study.临床医生如何在抗栓治疗中对慢性完全闭塞病变做出决策:一项定性研究。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 Sep 22;12:51. doi: 10.1186/s13033-018-0230-2. eCollection 2018.
10
Responsibilities with conflicting priorities: a qualitative study of ACT providers' experiences with community treatment orders.职责优先级相互冲突:对社区治疗令下积极社区治疗服务提供者经历的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 18;18(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3097-7.
相同的描述,不同的价值观。服务使用者和提供者如何定义医疗保健中的患者和公众参与。
Health Expect. 2013 Sep;16(3):266-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00713.x. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
4
The TMACT: a new tool for measuring fidelity to assertive community treatment.TMACT:一种用于测量坚持社区治疗的保真度的新工具。
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):17-29. doi: 10.1177/1078390310394658.
5
Clinical outcome of assertive community treatment (ACT) in a rural area in Denmark: a case-control study with a 2-year follow-up.丹麦农村地区积极社区治疗(ACT)的临床结果:一项为期2年随访的病例对照研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;65(5):299-305. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2010.544405. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
6
Intensive case management for severe mental illness.严重精神疾病的强化个案管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD007906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub2.
7
Consumer perceptions of assertive community treatment interventions.消费者对强化社区治疗干预措施的看法。
Community Ment Health J. 2011 Aug;47(4):408-14. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9335-z. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
8
Assertive community treatment as part of integrated care versus standard care: a 12-month trial in patients with first- and multiple-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders treated with quetiapine immediate release (ACCESS trial).以社区为基础的坚定治疗作为整合照料的一部分与标准护理的比较:在使用富马酸喹硫平速释剂治疗的首发和反复发作的精神分裂谱系障碍患者中进行的 12 个月试验(ACCESS 试验)。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;71(10):1313-23. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05113yel. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
9
Successful engagement: a mixed methods study of the approaches of assertive community treatment and community mental health teams in the REACT trial.成功参与:关于REACT试验中积极社区治疗和社区精神卫生团队方法的混合方法研究
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;44(7):532-40. doi: 10.1007/s00127-008-0472-4. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
10
The REACT study: randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment in north London.REACT研究:伦敦北部积极社区治疗的随机评估。
BMJ. 2006 Apr 8;332(7545):815-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38773.518322.7C. Epub 2006 Mar 16.