• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

节奏对下肢拮抗肌协同收缩训练(超级组训练)期间的运动量和肌电活动的影响。

Effect of cadence on volume and myoelectric activity during agonist-antagonist paired sets (supersets) in the lower body.

作者信息

Antunes Lara, Bezerra Ewertton de S, Sakugawa Raphael L, Dal Pupo Juliano

机构信息

a Biomechanics Laboratory , Santa Catarina Federal University , Florianopolis , Brazil.

b Human Performance Laboratory , Amazonas Federal University , Manaus , Brazil.

出版信息

Sports Biomech. 2018 Nov;17(4):502. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2017.1413130. Epub 2018 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1080/14763141.2017.1413130
PMID:29370715
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of cadence on volume load (VLoad) and muscle activity during agonist -antagonist paired sets (APS) in the lower body. Twelve trained men (24.0 ± 3.3 years; 78.3 ± 9.7 kg; 1.77 ± 0.58 m) volunteered to participate in this study. After the 10 maximum repetition test for leg extension and seated leg curl, participants performed three experimental protocols: first protocol (traditional)-three sets of only leg extension (60 bpm); second protocol (fast cadence)-three sets of leg extension, with each set preceded by one set on the seated leg curl with fast cadence (90 bpm); third protocol (slow cadence)-similar to the second, but seated leg curl with slow cadence (40 bpm). The total number of repetitions, VLoad and the electromyography activity for the vastus lateralis, vastus medialis and rectus femoris muscles were recorded. The VLoad was higher during APS than the traditional method, but the cadence (fast or slow) of antagonist exercise did not influence VLoad. Muscle activity of vastus lateralis was higher during traditional protocol; on the other hand, rectus femoris showed higher activity on APS fast cadence protocol, indicating that APS has a different influence on quadriceps components.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在下肢进行主动肌 - 拮抗肌配对训练(APS)时,节奏对容量负荷(VLoad)和肌肉活动的影响。12名受过训练的男性(年龄24.0 ± 3.3岁;体重78.3 ± 9.7千克;身高1.77 ± 0.58米)自愿参与本研究。在进行腿部伸展和坐姿腿弯举的10次最大重复测试后,参与者执行了三个实验方案:第一个方案(传统方案)——仅进行三组腿部伸展(每分钟60次节拍);第二个方案(快节奏)——三组腿部伸展,每组之前先进行一组快节奏(每分钟90次节拍)的坐姿腿弯举;第三个方案(慢节奏)——与第二个方案类似,但坐姿腿弯举采用慢节奏(每分钟40次节拍)。记录了重复次数总数、VLoad以及股外侧肌、股内侧肌和股直肌的肌电图活动。APS期间的VLoad高于传统方法,但拮抗肌运动的节奏(快或慢)并不影响VLoad。在传统方案中股外侧肌的肌肉活动较高;另一方面,股直肌在APS快节奏方案中表现出较高的活动,表明APS对股四头肌各部分有不同的影响。

相似文献

1
Effect of cadence on volume and myoelectric activity during agonist-antagonist paired sets (supersets) in the lower body.节奏对下肢拮抗肌协同收缩训练(超级组训练)期间的运动量和肌电活动的影响。
Sports Biomech. 2018 Nov;17(4):502. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2017.1413130. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
2
Effects of different rest intervals between antagonist paired sets on repetition performance and muscle activation.拮抗肌配对组间不同休息间隔对重复表现和肌肉激活的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Sep;28(9):2529-35. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000451.
3
Muscle activation during resistance exercise at 70% and 90% 1-repetition maximum in resistance-trained men.抗阻训练男性在进行70%和90% 1次重复最大重量的抗阻运动时的肌肉激活情况。
Muscle Nerve. 2017 Sep;56(3):505-509. doi: 10.1002/mus.25509. Epub 2017 Apr 2.
4
Electromyography Activation of the Lower-Limb Muscles Adopting a Physioball and Elastic Band to Stabilize the Knee Joint During Multiple Sets With Submaximal Loads.在多组次亚最大负荷训练期间,采用健身球和弹力带稳定膝关节时下肢肌肉的肌电图激活情况
J Sport Rehabil. 2017 Sep;26(5):406-414. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0194. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
5
Myoeletric indices of fatigue adopting different rest intervals during leg press sets.在腿举组中采用不同休息间隔时的肌肉疲劳电生理指标。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Jan;22(1):178-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
6
Effect of a rest-pause vs. traditional squat on electromyography and lifting volume in trained women.休息-暂停深蹲与传统深蹲对训练有素女性的肌电图和举重量的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Jul;118(7):1309-1314. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3863-6. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
7
Unique activation of the quadriceps femoris during single- and multi-joint exercises.股四头肌在单关节和多关节运动中的独特激活。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 May;116(5):1031-41. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3363-5. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
8
Behavior of emg activation of rectus femoris, vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles during maximum contraction before and after a series of repeated efforts.在一系列重复运动前后,股直肌、股外侧肌和股内侧肌在最大收缩时的肌电图激活情况。
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;48(8):377-84.
9
Myoeletric Activity of the Quadriceps During Leg Press Exercise Performed With Differing Techniques.不同技术进行腿举运动时股四头肌的肌电活动
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Feb;31(2):422-429. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001494.
10
Range of motion and leg rotation affect electromyography activation levels of the superficial quadriceps muscles during leg extension.在腿部伸展过程中,运动范围和腿部旋转会影响股四头肌浅层肌肉的肌电图激活水平。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Sep;28(9):2536-45. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000582.

引用本文的文献

1
Superset Versus Traditional Resistance Training Prescriptions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Exploring Acute and Chronic Effects on Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Variables.超级组训练与传统抗阻训练方案:一项关于对力学、代谢和感知变量的急性和慢性影响的系统评价与荟萃分析
Sports Med. 2025 Apr;55(4):953-975. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02176-8. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
2
A comparison of acute affective responses, physiological measures and training volume between superset and traditional resistance training in untrained adults.未经训练的成年人进行超级组训练与传统阻力训练时的急性情感反应、生理指标及训练量比较。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jan 17;7:1536747. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1536747. eCollection 2025.
3
A Comparison of Affective Responses Between Time Efficient and Traditional Resistance Training.
高效训练与传统阻力训练的情感反应比较
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 16;13:912368. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912368. eCollection 2022.
4
No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review.没时间举重?设计高效的力量和肥大训练计划:叙事性综述。
Sports Med. 2021 Oct;51(10):2079-2095. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01490-1. Epub 2021 Jun 14.