Suppr超能文献

分配频率是否重要?对德国欧盟学校水果和蔬菜计划进行的两次和三次每周配送效果的亚组特定分析比较。

Does the distribution frequency matter? A subgroup specific analysis of the effectiveness of the EU School Fruit and Vegetable Scheme in Germany comparing twice and thrice weekly deliveries.

机构信息

1Institute for Food and Resource Economics,Department of Agricultural and Food Market Research,University of Bonn,Nussallee 21,53115 Bonn,Germany.

2Department of Psychology,University of Koblenz-Landau,Landau,Germany.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2018 May;21(7):1375-1387. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003949. Epub 2018 Jan 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to examine the effectiveness of two different implementation forms of the EU School Fruit and Vegetable Scheme (SFVS).

DESIGN

A quasi-experimental design was applied including a thrice as well as a twice weekly intervention group. Repeated 24 h dietary recalls were used to measure children's fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake. Effects were analysed on days with and without F&V deliveries using hierarchical linear regression models.

SETTING

Twelve primary schools in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.

SUBJECTS

Third and fourth graders (n 664).

RESULTS

Average daily F&V intake at pre-intervention was 0·84 frequencies in the thrice weekly intervention group, 0·90 frequencies in the twice weekly intervention group and 1·25 frequencies in the control group. Providing children thrice weekly with F&V increased children's F&V intake on average by 0·96 (P<0·001) frequencies/d. The effects were higher on days with (1·07; P<0·001) than on days without (0·75; P<0·001) F&V deliveries. Distributing F&V twice weekly resulted in an increase of 0·75 (P<0·001) frequencies/d on average, again with higher effects on days with (1·30; P<0·001) than without (0·48; P<0·003) F&V deliveries. Subgroup analysis revealed some indications for differential effectiveness only in the twice weekly intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

The SFVS with thrice or twice weekly deliveries of F&V led to a significant increase in children's F&V intake on days with and without deliveries. The latter might provide an indication of positive long-term effects of the scheme. The scheme shows equal efficiency for almost all subgroups.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验欧盟学校蔬果计划(SFVS)两种不同实施形式的效果。

设计

采用准实验设计,包括每周三次和两次干预组。使用重复 24 h 膳食回忆法来衡量儿童的蔬果摄入量。使用分层线性回归模型分析有无蔬果配送日的效果。

设置

德国北莱茵-威斯特法伦州的 12 所小学。

受试者

三、四年级学生(n 664)。

结果

在干预前,每周三次干预组的平均每日蔬果摄入量为 0.84 份,每周两次干预组为 0.90 份,对照组为 1.25 份。每周三次为儿童提供蔬果可使儿童的蔬果摄入量平均增加 0.96(P<0.001)份/d。有蔬果配送日的效果更高(1.07;P<0.001),无蔬果配送日的效果较低(0.75;P<0.001)。每周两次分发蔬果可使平均摄入量增加 0.75(P<0.001)份/d,有蔬果配送日的效果更高(1.30;P<0.001),无蔬果配送日的效果较低(0.48;P<0.003)。亚组分析仅在每周两次干预组中显示出一些差异效果的迹象。

结论

SFVS 每周三次或两次配送蔬果可显著增加儿童有和无蔬果配送日的蔬果摄入量。后者可能表明该计划具有积极的长期效果。该计划对几乎所有亚组都具有相同的效率。

相似文献

9

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years.25年间195个国家超重和肥胖对健康的影响
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):13-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验