• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜单孔阑尾切除术:小儿外科的评估

Laparoscopic one port appendectomy: Evaluation in pediatric surgery.

作者信息

Binet Aurelian, Braïk Karim, Lengelle Francois, Laffon Marc, Lardy Hubert, Amar Sarah

机构信息

Pediatric Surgery Unit, Hospital, Universitary Center of Tours, Gatien de Clocheville Hospital, 37000 Tours, France.

Pediatric Surgery Unit, Hospital, Universitary Center of Tours, Gatien de Clocheville Hospital, 37000 Tours, France.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Nov;53(11):2322-2325. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.12.018. Epub 2017 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.12.018
PMID:29370892
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Appendectomy is a well-established surgical procedure in pediatric surgery used in the management of acute appendicitis. With the continuous advancement in the field of minimal invasive surgery, the recent focus is on single incision laparoscopic (SIL) surgery. SILA also goes further in order to decrease pain, improve recovery and enhance patient satisfaction. However, this approach is still not a well-established technique and not widely practiced, especially in pediatric surgery.

METHODS

We prospectively recorded the data in our pediatric universitary hospital center since January, 01 2017 to July, 01 2017. Patients included in this study were randomized in two groups: SILA group (managed by one-port laparoscopy, n=40) and LA group (conventional laparoscopy using three trocars, n=40).

RESULTS

The mean operative time for SILA was significantly lower. There were no postoperative complications in SILA group. If peritonitis was associated with appendicitis, the operative duration was not significantly different between each group. The duration in recovery room after surgery was significantly lower in SILA group. The morphine consumption was significantly lower for SILA group according to patient weight. SILA is less painful significantly than CLA for the first postoperative 6 h. After, even if SILA appears less painful, difference is not significant. The hospital length of stay was significantly higher in LA than SILA group CONCLUSIONS: SILA procedure for appendectomy appears to be safe and efficient for appendicitis management in children. This technique could be applied in routine as in emergency tome.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective comparative study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

摘要

背景

阑尾切除术是小儿外科中用于治疗急性阑尾炎的成熟手术方法。随着微创手术领域的不断发展,近期的重点是单切口腹腔镜(SIL)手术。单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SILA)更是为了减轻疼痛、促进恢复并提高患者满意度而进一步发展。然而,这种方法仍不是一种成熟的技术,尚未广泛应用,尤其是在小儿外科领域。

方法

自2017年1月1日至2017年7月1日,我们在儿科大学医院中心前瞻性地记录了数据。本研究纳入的患者被随机分为两组:SILA组(通过单孔腹腔镜手术治疗,n = 40)和LA组(使用三个套管针的传统腹腔镜手术,n = 40)。

结果

SILA组的平均手术时间明显更短。SILA组无术后并发症。如果阑尾炎伴有腹膜炎,每组之间的手术持续时间无显著差异。SILA组术后在恢复室的停留时间明显更短。根据患者体重,SILA组的吗啡消耗量明显更低。术后第1个6小时内,SILA组的疼痛明显比传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CLA)轻。之后,即使SILA组似乎疼痛较轻,但差异不显著。LA组的住院时间明显长于SILA组。结论:SILA阑尾切除手术在儿童阑尾炎治疗中似乎是安全有效的。这种技术可在常规及急诊情况下应用。

研究类型

前瞻性对比研究 证据级别:II级

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic one port appendectomy: Evaluation in pediatric surgery.腹腔镜单孔阑尾切除术:小儿外科的评估
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Nov;53(11):2322-2325. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.12.018. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
2
Single-Incision Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.单切口与三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:短期和长期结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Aug;27(8):804-811. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0406. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
3
A prospective randomized comparison of single-port laparoscopic procedure with open and standard 3-port laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of acute appendicitis.单孔腹腔镜手术与开放手术及标准三孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Feb;23(1):74-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182754543.
4
Single site versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: some pain for no gain?经单一切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:有痛无益?
J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:321-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.010. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
5
Single-incision appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis.单孔阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术相当:一项系统评价与汇总分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Aug;22(4):319-27. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824f2cf8.
6
Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Nov;35:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.087. Epub 2016 Oct 2.
7
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children And Conversion to Multiport Appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜小儿阑尾切除术及中转多孔阑尾切除术。
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:223-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.050. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
8
Should single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy be the new standard for pediatric appendicitis?单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否应成为小儿阑尾炎的新标准?
Pediatr Neonatol. 2020 Aug;61(4):426-431. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2020.03.013. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
Cosmetic outcomes following appendectomy in children: a comparison of surgical techniques.儿童阑尾切除术后的美容效果:手术技术比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Aug;24(8):584-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0061.
10
Efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in adults and adolescents using an endolinear stapler.使用直线切割吻合器行单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术在成人及青少年中的疗效
Osaka City Med J. 2014 Jun;60(1):21-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis.单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗疑似单纯性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub3.
2
Postoperative narcotic utilization in single incision laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal appendectomy (SILEA): a single-institution retrospective review.单切口腹腔镜辅助经皮阑尾切除术(SILEA)术后阿片类药物的利用:单机构回顾性研究。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Dec;38(12):1997-2003. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05252-6. Epub 2022 Sep 22.