Suppr超能文献

单孔腹腔镜手术与开放手术及标准三孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的前瞻性随机对照研究。

A prospective randomized comparison of single-port laparoscopic procedure with open and standard 3-port laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Sozutek Alper, Colak Tahsin, Dirlik Musa, Ocal Koray, Turkmenoglu Ozgur, Dag Ahmet

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Mersin University Medical Faculty Research and Training Hospital, Mersin, Turkey.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Feb;23(1):74-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182754543.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This prospective randomized study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) comparing with open appendectomy (OA) and standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SLA) in the treatment of acute appendicitis (AA).

METHODS

Adult patients older than 18 years presenting with AA were randomized into 3 groups to undergo OA, SLA, and SILA from September 2010 to May 2011. The groups were compared with regard of patient's characteristics, perioperative findings/complications, operative time, pain severity, analgesic requirement, time to oral tolerance and flatus, length of hospital stay, and cosmetic results.

RESULTS

A total of 75 consecutive patients enrolled in the study. Each group included 25 patients. The groups showed no significant differences in patient's characteristics. The mean operative time was significantly longer in SILA than OA with a mean difference of 7 minutes (P < 0.05). Postoperative pain after OA were significantly higher than SLA and SILA (P < 0.05). The average time to oral tolerance and flatus was significantly higher in OA than the laparoscopic groups with a mean difference of 1 and 2.5 hours (P = 0.04 and 0.023, respectively). The length of hospital stay in SLA and SILA was significantly lower than OA with a mean difference of 0.8 days (P < 0.05). There was no difference in overall complications between the groups. There was no difference between SLA and SILA in terms of surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Either SLA or SILA offer patients faster recovery period with acceptable complications than OA. Hence, laparoscopic approach might be considered as first option in the treatment of AA. However, all 3 techniques provide equivalent clinical outcomes despite the significant findings. Therefore, technique selection is based on surgeon's decision, experience, and availability of laparoscopic instruments.

摘要

背景

这项前瞻性随机研究旨在评估单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SILA)与开腹阑尾切除术(OA)及标准三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SLA)在治疗急性阑尾炎(AA)方面的手术效果。

方法

2010年9月至2011年5月,将年龄大于18岁的成年AA患者随机分为3组,分别接受OA、SLA和SILA治疗。对各组患者的特征、围手术期发现/并发症、手术时间、疼痛严重程度、镇痛需求、恢复经口进食和排气时间、住院时间及美容效果进行比较。

结果

共有75例连续患者纳入本研究。每组25例。各组患者特征无显著差异。SILA组的平均手术时间显著长于OA组,平均差值为7分钟(P<0.05)。OA组术后疼痛显著高于SLA组和SILA组(P<0.05)。OA组恢复经口进食和排气的平均时间显著高于腹腔镜手术组,平均差值分别为1小时和2.5小时(分别为P=0.04和0.023)。SLA组和SILA组的住院时间显著低于OA组,平均差值为0.8天(P<0.05)。各组总体并发症无差异。SLA组和SILA组的手术效果无差异。

结论

与OA相比,SLA或SILA均可使患者恢复期更快,并发症可接受。因此,腹腔镜手术方法可被视为AA治疗的首选。然而,尽管有显著发现,但所有3种技术的临床效果相当。因此,技术选择应基于外科医生的决定、经验及腹腔镜器械的可用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验