Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland,
School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute for Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3806, Australia.
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 28;38(9):2163-2176. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2340-17.2018. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
Despite their small size, microsaccades can impede stimulus detections if executed at inopportune times. Although it has been shown that microsaccades evoke both inhibitory and excitatory responses across different visual regions, their impact on the higher-level neural decision processes that bridge sensory responses to action selection has yet to be examined. Here, we show that when human observers monitor stimuli for subtle feature changes, the occurrence of microsaccades long after (up to 800 ms) change onset predicts slower reaction times and this is accounted for by momentary suppression of neural signals at each key stage of decision formation: visual evidence encoding, evidence accumulation, and motor preparation. Our data further reveal that, independent of the timing of the change events, the onset of neural decision formation coincides with a systematic inhibition of microsaccade production, persisting until the perceptual report is executed. Our combined behavioral and neural measures highlight antagonistic interactions between microsaccade occurrence and evidence accumulation during visual decision-making tasks. When fixating on a location in space, we frequently make tiny eye movements called microsaccades. In the present study, we show that these microsaccades impede our ability to make perceptual decisions about visual stimuli and this impediment specifically occurs via the disruption of several processing levels of the sensorimotor network: the encoding of visual evidence itself, the accumulation of visual evidence toward a response, and effector-selective motor preparation. Furthermore, we show that the production of microsaccades is inhibited during the perceptual decision, possibly as a counteractive measure to mitigate their negative effect on behavior in this context. The combined behavioral and neural measures used in this study provide strong and novel evidence for the interaction of fixational eye movements and the perceptual decision-making process.
尽管微扫视的幅度很小,但如果在不恰当的时间执行,它们可能会阻碍对刺激的检测。虽然已经表明微扫视会在不同的视觉区域引发抑制和兴奋反应,但它们对连接感觉反应和动作选择的高级神经决策过程的影响尚未被研究。在这里,我们表明,当人类观察者监测刺激以发现微妙的特征变化时,变化发生后很长时间(长达 800 毫秒)发生的微扫视会导致反应时间变慢,这可以通过在决策形成的每个关键阶段瞬间抑制神经信号来解释:视觉证据编码、证据积累和运动准备。我们的数据进一步表明,与变化事件的时间无关,神经决策形成的开始与微扫视产生的系统性抑制同时发生,这种抑制持续到执行感知报告。我们的综合行为和神经测量结果突出了在视觉决策任务中微扫视发生和证据积累之间的拮抗相互作用。当我们注视空间中的一个位置时,我们经常会进行微小的眼球运动,称为微扫视。在本研究中,我们表明这些微扫视会阻碍我们对视觉刺激进行感知决策的能力,这种阻碍具体通过破坏感觉运动网络的几个处理层次来实现:视觉证据本身的编码、朝向反应的视觉证据的积累以及效应器选择性运动准备。此外,我们表明,在感知决策期间,微扫视的产生受到抑制,这可能是为了减轻它们在这种情况下对行为的负面影响而采取的反制措施。本研究中使用的综合行为和神经测量结果为固定眼动和感知决策过程的相互作用提供了强有力的新证据。