• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不稳定注视对阅读、物体追踪的影响及其对阅读困难诊断和干预的意义。

Unstable foveation's impact on reading, object tracking, and its implications for diagnosing and intervening in reading difficulties.

作者信息

Chamani Niloufar, Schmid Michael Christoph, Rima Samy

机构信息

Department of Neuro- and Movement Sciences, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 24;15(1):6546. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83316-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-83316-4
PMID:39994232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11850882/
Abstract

Foveation, the ability to focus on a point for clear vision, is crucial for reading smoothly and tracking moving objects. Research shows that unstable foveation disrupts reading by causing more frequent eye movements. However, it's unclear if this also affects smooth tracking of moving targets in slow readers. This study therefore investigates the link between foveation during reading and the tracking of moving targets, in a large group of participants displaying variable reading speeds in a virtual reality environment. Our analysis shows that slower readers have more intrusive fixational eye movements characterized by greater spatial and temporal variability during reading. Additionally, these readers display less efficient tracking of moving targets. Interestingly, the rate and spatial variability of catch-up saccades during object tracking correlates with fixational eye movement rates and spatial variability during reading. Our findings thus demonstrate that poor foveation stability in slow readers also affects other eye movement activities, such as during object tracking. We conclude with a discussion on the limitations of virtual reality-based reading assessment and the shared mechanisms of foveal stabilization, which might be altered under conditions of reading impairment.

摘要

注视,即聚焦于一点以获得清晰视觉的能力,对于流畅阅读和追踪移动物体至关重要。研究表明,不稳定的注视会因导致更频繁的眼动而干扰阅读。然而,目前尚不清楚这是否也会影响阅读速度较慢者对移动目标的平稳追踪。因此,本研究在虚拟现实环境中,对一大群阅读速度各异的参与者进行了调查,以探究阅读过程中的注视与移动目标追踪之间的联系。我们的分析表明,阅读速度较慢者在阅读过程中具有更多侵入性的注视性眼动,其特征在于更大的空间和时间变异性。此外,这些读者对移动目标的追踪效率较低。有趣且的是,物体追踪过程中追赶性扫视的速度和空间变异性与阅读过程中的注视性眼动速度以及空间变异性相关。因此,我们的研究结果表明,阅读速度较慢者的注视稳定性较差也会影响其他眼动活动,例如在物体追踪过程中。我们最后讨论了基于虚拟现实的阅读评估的局限性以及中央凹稳定的共同机制,这些机制可能在阅读障碍的情况下发生改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652a/11850882/0d045a489556/41598_2024_83316_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652a/11850882/3efba440018a/41598_2024_83316_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652a/11850882/f7080c702539/41598_2024_83316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652a/11850882/409b80c27502/41598_2024_83316_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652a/11850882/0d045a489556/41598_2024_83316_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652a/11850882/3efba440018a/41598_2024_83316_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652a/11850882/f7080c702539/41598_2024_83316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652a/11850882/409b80c27502/41598_2024_83316_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652a/11850882/0d045a489556/41598_2024_83316_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Unstable foveation's impact on reading, object tracking, and its implications for diagnosing and intervening in reading difficulties.不稳定注视对阅读、物体追踪的影响及其对阅读困难诊断和干预的意义。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 24;15(1):6546. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83316-4.
2
A foveal target increases catch-up saccade frequency during smooth pursuit.在平稳跟踪过程中,中央凹目标会增加矫正性扫视的频率。
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Mar;115(3):1220-7. doi: 10.1152/jn.00774.2015. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
3
Differences in eye movements and reading problems in dyslexic and normal children.诵读困难儿童与正常儿童在眼球运动及阅读问题上的差异。
Vision Res. 1994 May;34(10):1345-58. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90209-7.
4
Reading Specific Small Saccades Predict Individual Phonemic Awareness and Reading Speed.阅读特定的小扫视眼动可预测个体的音素意识和阅读速度。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Dec 13;15:663242. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.663242. eCollection 2021.
5
Dyslexic and normal readers' eye movements.阅读障碍者与正常读者的眼球运动。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1983 Oct;9(5):816-25. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.9.5.816.
6
Fixational instability and saccadic eye movements of dyslexic children with subtle cerebellar dysfunction.伴有轻微小脑功能障碍的诵读困难儿童的注视不稳定和眼球跳动
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988 Mar;65(3):174-81. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198803000-00006.
7
Smooth pursuit eye movements in normal and dyslexic children.正常儿童和诵读困难儿童的平稳跟踪眼球运动。
Percept Mot Skills. 1984 Aug;59(1):91-100. doi: 10.2466/pms.1984.59.1.91.
8
Eye movements of university students with and without reading difficulties during naming speed tasks.在命名速度任务中,有阅读困难和无阅读困难的大学生的眼球运动。
Ann Dyslexia. 2014 Jul;64(2):137-50. doi: 10.1007/s11881-013-0090-z. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
9
Two types of foveation strategy in 'latent' nystagmus: fixation, visual acuity and stability.“潜在性”眼球震颤的两种注视策略:注视、视力与稳定性。
Neuroophthalmology. 1995 Aug;15(4):167-86. doi: 10.3109/01658109509044600.
10
Predictive posture stabilization before contact with moving objects: equivalence of smooth pursuit tracking and peripheral vision.预测与移动物体接触前的姿势稳定:平滑追踪跟踪和周边视觉的等效性。
J Neurophysiol. 2024 Sep 1;132(3):695-709. doi: 10.1152/jn.00158.2024. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
GazeBaseVR, a large-scale, longitudinal, binocular eye-tracking dataset collected in virtual reality.GazeBaseVR,一个大规模、纵向、双眼追踪虚拟现实数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Mar 30;10(1):177. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02075-5.
2
Eye drift during fixation predicts visual acuity.注视时的眼球漂移可预测视力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 6;119(49):e2200256119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2200256119. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
3
Reading Specific Small Saccades Predict Individual Phonemic Awareness and Reading Speed.阅读特定的小扫视眼动可预测个体的音素意识和阅读速度。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Dec 13;15:663242. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.663242. eCollection 2021.
4
A change in perspective: The interaction of saccadic and pursuit eye movements in oculomotor control and perception.视角的转变:扫视和追踪眼球运动在眼球运动控制和感知中的相互作用。
Vision Res. 2021 Nov;188:283-296. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
5
Neuronal variability reflects probabilistic inference tuned to natural image statistics.神经元变异性反映了针对自然图像统计数据进行概率推断的调整。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 15;12(1):3635. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23838-x.
6
What makes a microsaccade? A review of 70 years of research prompts a new detection method.是什么引发了微扫视?对70年研究的回顾催生了一种新的检测方法。
J Eye Mov Res. 2020 Mar 17;12(6). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.6.13.
7
Characterizing gaze position signals and synthesizing noise during fixations in eye-tracking data.在眼动追踪数据中,对注视位置信号进行特征化描述,并对注视期间的噪声进行合成。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Dec;52(6):2515-2534. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01400-9.
8
Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation.在决策形成过程中,微扫视与证据积累过程之间的拮抗相互作用。
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 28;38(9):2163-2176. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2340-17.2018. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
9
Microsaccades during reading.阅读过程中的微扫视。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0185180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185180. eCollection 2017.
10
Microsaccades are sensitive to word structure: A novel approach to study language processing.微扫视对外显词结构敏感:一种研究语言加工的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 21;7(1):3999. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04391-4.