Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; International Max Planck Graduate School of Behavioral and Neural Sciences, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; Animal Physiology Unit, Institute for Neurobiology, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; Animal Physiology Unit, Institute for Neurobiology, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Curr Biol. 2015 Aug 17;25(16):2065-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
Neuronal response gain enhancement is a classic signature of the allocation of covert visual attention without eye movements. However, microsaccades continuously occur during gaze fixation. Because these tiny eye movements are preceded by motor preparatory signals well before they are triggered, it may be the case that a corollary of such signals may cause enhancement, even without attentional cueing. In six different macaque monkeys and two different brain areas previously implicated in covert visual attention (superior colliculus and frontal eye fields), we show neuronal response gain enhancement for peripheral stimuli appearing immediately before microsaccades. This enhancement occurs both during simple fixation with behaviorally irrelevant peripheral stimuli and when the stimuli are relevant for the subsequent allocation of covert visual attention. Moreover, this enhancement occurs in both purely visual neurons and visual-motor neurons, and it is replaced by suppression for stimuli appearing immediately after microsaccades. Our results suggest that there may be an obligatory link between microsaccade occurrence and peripheral selective processing, even though microsaccades can be orders of magnitude smaller than the eccentricities of peripheral stimuli. Because microsaccades occur in a repetitive manner during fixation, and because these eye movements reset neurophysiological rhythms every time they occur, our results highlight a possible mechanism through which oculomotor events may aid periodic sampling of the visual environment for the benefit of perception, even when gaze is prevented from overtly shifting. One functional consequence of such periodic sampling could be the magnification of rhythmic fluctuations of peripheral covert visual attention.
神经元反应增益增强是一种经典的标志,表明在不进行眼球运动的情况下,对隐蔽视觉注意力进行了分配。然而,在注视时,微扫视会持续发生。因为这些微小的眼球运动在触发之前,会有运动预备信号提前出现,所以即使没有注意力提示,这些信号的副产物也可能导致增强。在六只不同的猕猴和两个先前涉及隐蔽视觉注意力的不同脑区(上丘和额眼区)中,我们发现微扫视前出现的外周刺激会增强神经元的反应增益。这种增强既发生在行为上无关的外周刺激的简单注视期间,也发生在随后分配隐蔽视觉注意力的刺激时。此外,这种增强既发生在纯粹的视觉神经元中,也发生在视觉-运动神经元中,而对于微扫视后立即出现的刺激,则会出现抑制。我们的结果表明,即使微扫视的幅度可能比外周刺激的偏心率小几个数量级,微扫视的发生和外周选择性处理之间可能存在强制性联系。由于在注视期间微扫视会以重复的方式发生,并且这些眼动每次发生都会重置神经生理节律,因此我们的结果强调了一种可能的机制,即眼球运动事件可能有助于周期性地对视觉环境进行采样,从而有利于感知,即使眼球无法明显移动。这种周期性采样的一个功能后果可能是放大外周隐蔽视觉注意力的节律波动。