Sanford T J, Smith N T, Dec-Silver H, Harrison W K
Anesth Analg. 1986 Mar;65(3):259-66.
We compared anesthetic doses of three popular opiates, morphine (n = 10), fentanyl (n = 9), and sufentanil (n = 9) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Opiate administration after induction was based upon EEG and cardiovascular signs of the depth of anesthesia. Total doses were morphine, 4.4 +/- 0.71 mg/kg, fentanyl, 95.4 +/- 9.9 micrograms/kg, and sufentanil, 18.9 +/- 2.2 micrograms/kg. Comparisons among opiates included times for induction of anesthesia, return of consciousness, return of spontaneous ventilation, return of adequate cardiovascular status, and extubation. The following times (mean and SEM) were significantly (P less than 0.05) shorter for sufentanil than for fentanyl or morphine: induction (15 +/- 2.3 min, 5.9 +/- 0.7 min, and 3.0 +/- 0.2 min for morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil, respectively); return of consciousness (morphine 109.7 +/- 34.4 min, fentanyl 62.3 +/- 17.9 min, sufentanil 17 +/- 8.7 min); return of acceptable and stable cardiovascular status (morphine 587.3 +/- 139.3 min, fentanyl 537.9 +/- 144.8 min, sufentanil 173.7 +/- 56.8 min); and extubation (morphine 1121.3 +/- 61.8 min, fentanyl 1005.7 +/- 77.7 min, sufentanil 533.3 +/- 67.8 min). We conclude that sufentanil administered in the dosage range of 19 micrograms/kg allows more rapid induction, earlier emergence from anesthesia, and faster extubation of patients than either morphine or fentanyl.
我们比较了三种常用阿片类药物(吗啡,n = 10;芬太尼,n = 9;舒芬太尼,n = 9)在心脏手术患者中的麻醉剂量。诱导后阿片类药物的给药基于脑电图和麻醉深度的心血管体征。总剂量分别为:吗啡4.4±0.71mg/kg、芬太尼95.4±9.9μg/kg、舒芬太尼18.9±2.2μg/kg。阿片类药物之间的比较包括麻醉诱导时间、意识恢复时间、自主呼吸恢复时间、心血管状态恢复正常时间和拔管时间。舒芬太尼的以下时间(平均值和标准误)明显(P<0.05)短于芬太尼或吗啡:诱导时间(吗啡、芬太尼和舒芬太尼分别为15±2.3分钟、5.9±0.7分钟和3.0±0.2分钟);意识恢复时间(吗啡109.7±34.4分钟、芬太尼62.3±17.9分钟、舒芬太尼17±8.7分钟);心血管状态恢复到可接受且稳定的时间(吗啡587.3±139.3分钟、芬太尼537.9±144.8分钟、舒芬太尼173.7±56.8分钟);以及拔管时间(吗啡1121.3±61.8分钟、芬太尼1005.7±77.7分钟、舒芬太尼533.3±67.8分钟)。我们得出结论,与吗啡或芬太尼相比,以19μg/kg的剂量范围给予舒芬太尼可使患者更快诱导麻醉、更早苏醒并更快拔管。