Suppr超能文献

一项比较地西泮与舒芬太尼产生的清醒镇静效果的随机双盲试验性研究。

A randomized double-blind pilot study to compare conscious sedation produced by diazepam against sufentanil.

作者信息

Hatton M N, Williams D, Weis F R

出版信息

Anesth Prog. 1987 Jul-Aug;34(4):137-41.

Abstract

Intravenous sufentanil, an analog of fentanyl, was compared to diazepam for conscious sedation in ambulatory dental outpatients. Ten patients undergoing the surgical removal of impacted third molars served as subjects in a double-blind, within-subject, single crossover study. Sedation was achieved with a combination of 30% nitrous oxide/70% oxygen by nasal mask and either diazepam (0.05-0.15 mg/kg) or sufentanic (0.05-0.15 μg/kg) titrated to a clinical endpoint of altered speech and relaxation. Intraoperative physiologic monitoring, patients' and the oral surgeon's subjective estimates of efficacy and psychomotor recovery were used to compare the two treatments. Both patients (eight of 10) and surgeons (six of 10) preferred sufentanil sedation. No significant differences were noted between treatments for psychomotor recovery. These preliminary data in a small sample suggest that sufentanil produces adequate conscious sedation in dental outpatients and should be evaluated further with larger patient samples.

摘要

将芬太尼类似物静脉注射舒芬太尼与地西泮用于门诊牙科患者的清醒镇静进行比较。在一项双盲、受试者自身、单交叉研究中,10名接受阻生第三磨牙拔除手术的患者作为研究对象。通过鼻罩吸入30%氧化亚氮/70%氧气,并滴定给予地西泮(0.05 - 0.15 mg/kg)或舒芬太尼(0.05 - 0.15 μg/kg),以达到言语改变和放松的临床终点来实现镇静。采用术中生理监测、患者及口腔外科医生对疗效和精神运动恢复的主观评估来比较两种治疗方法。患者(10名中的8名)和外科医生(10名中的6名)均更倾向于舒芬太尼镇静。两种治疗方法在精神运动恢复方面未观察到显著差异。该小样本的初步数据表明,舒芬太尼可为牙科门诊患者提供充分的清醒镇静,应使用更大样本的患者进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验