Shiraki Nobuhiko, Sakimoto Susumu, Sakaguchi Hirokazu, Nishida Kentaro, Nishida Kohji, Kamei Motohiro
Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Ophthalmology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 26;13(1):e0191531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191531. eCollection 2018.
To compare the anatomic and functional outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for treating rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) between two groups with and without postoperative prone positioning.
This retrospective cohort study included 142 eyes of 142 patients with a primary RRD. All patients underwent PPV with 20% sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade and were divided into two groups: the groups that did and did not maintain a prone position postoperatively. All patients were followed for more than 3 months. The main outcome measures were the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal reattachment rate, and postoperative complications.
Sixty-five eyes were included in the prone position group and 77 eyes in the group without prone positioning; the respective initial reattachment rates were 83.1% and 96.1%, a difference that reach significance (p = 0.011). In the eyes with inferior breaks, the initial reattachment rate was 94.7% (18 eyes) without prone positioning, which was significantly (p = 0.036) better than the 60% (6 eyes) initial reattachment rate in the group with prone positioning. In the eyes without inferior breaks, there was no significant difference in the initial reattachment rates between the two groups. The BCVAs at the 3-month postoperative visit did not differ significantly between the two groups. An epiretinal membrane (ERM) was observed postoperatively in 10 (13.0%) eyes in the group without prone positioning; no ERMs were seen postoperatively in eyes in which the internal limiting membrane (ILM) was peeled during PPV.
PPV without postoperative prone positioning is associated with a higher reattachment rate in eyes with a RRD, especially those with inferior retinal breaks. PPV with postoperative supine and lateral positioning might be beneficial to manage RRDs associated with inferior retinal breaks if ILM peeling is performed intraoperatively.
比较有和没有术后俯卧位的两组患者行玻璃体切割术(PPV)治疗孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)的解剖和功能结果。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了142例原发性RRD患者的142只眼。所有患者均接受PPV联合20%六氟化硫气体填塞,并分为两组:术后保持和不保持俯卧位的组。所有患者均随访超过3个月。主要观察指标为最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、视网膜复位率和术后并发症。
俯卧位组纳入65只眼,非俯卧位组纳入77只眼;各自的初始复位率分别为83.1%和96.1%,差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.011)。在下方裂孔的眼中,非俯卧位组的初始复位率为94.7%(18只眼),显著优于俯卧位组60%(6只眼)的初始复位率(p = 0.036)。在没有下方裂孔的眼中,两组的初始复位率没有显著差异。两组术后3个月的BCVA没有显著差异。非俯卧位组有10只眼(13.0%)术后观察到视网膜前膜(ERM);在PPV期间进行内界膜(ILM)剥离的眼中,术后未观察到ERM。
PPV术后不进行俯卧位与RRD患者的视网膜复位率较高相关,尤其是那些有下方视网膜裂孔的患者。如果术中进行ILM剥离,PPV术后仰卧位和侧卧位可能有利于治疗与下方视网膜裂孔相关的RRD。