Unit of Population Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(6):663-669. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053986. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
Smoking bans were suggested to reduce smoking prevalence and increase quit ratio but their equity impact remains unclear. We aimed to characterise the socioeconomic status (SES)-related inequalities in smoking prevalence and quit ratio before and after the implementation of a public smoking ban.
We included data from 17 544 participants in the population-based cross-sectional Bus Santé study in Geneva, Switzerland, between 1995 and 2014. We considered educational attainment (primary, secondary and tertiary) as a SES indicator. Outcomes were smoking prevalence (proportion of current smokers) and quit ratio (ex-smokers to ever-smokers ratio). We used segmented linear regression to assess the overall impact of smoking ban on outcome trends. We calculated the relative (RII) and slope (SII, absolute difference) indexes of inequality, quantifying disparities between educational groups in outcomes overall (1995-2014), before and after ban implementation (November 2009).
Least educated participants displayed higher smoking prevalence (RII=2.04, P<0.001; SII=0.15, P<0.001) and lower quit ratio (RII=0.73, P<0.001; SII=-0.18, P<0.001). As in other studies, smoking ban implementation coincided with a temporary reduction of smoking prevalence (P=0.003) and increase in quit ratio (P=0.02), with a progressive return to preban levels. Inequalities increased (P<0.05) in relative terms for smoking prevalence (RII=1.84, P<0.001 and RII=3.01, P<0.001) and absolute terms for both outcomes (smoking prevalence: SII=0.14, P<0.001 and SII=0.19, P<0.001; quit ratio: SII=-0.15, P<0.001 and SII=-0.27, P<0.001).
Implementation of a public smoking ban coincided with a short-lived decrease in smoking prevalence and increase in quit ratio but also with a widening in SES inequalities in smoking-related outcomes.
禁烟措施被建议用于降低吸烟率和提高戒烟率,但它们的公平性影响仍不清楚。我们旨在描述实施公共场所禁烟令前后,与社会经济地位(SES)相关的吸烟率和戒烟率的不平等情况。
我们纳入了瑞士日内瓦基于人群的横断面 Bus Santé 研究中 17544 名参与者的数据,该研究在 1995 年至 2014 年期间进行。我们将教育程度(小学、中学和高等教育)作为 SES 指标。结果是吸烟率(当前吸烟者的比例)和戒烟率(戒烟者与曾经吸烟者的比例)。我们使用分段线性回归来评估禁烟令对结果趋势的总体影响。我们计算了不平等的相对(RII)和斜率(SII,绝对差异)指数,量化了教育程度不同的人群在整个(1995-2014 年)和禁令实施前后(2009 年 11 月)的结果之间的差异。
受教育程度最低的参与者吸烟率更高(RII=2.04,P<0.001;SII=0.15,P<0.001),戒烟率更低(RII=0.73,P<0.001;SII=-0.18,P<0.001)。与其他研究一样,禁烟令的实施与吸烟率的暂时降低(P=0.003)和戒烟率的增加(P=0.02)同时发生,随后逐渐恢复到禁令实施前的水平。相对而言,吸烟率的不平等程度增加(P<0.05)(RII=1.84,P<0.001 和 RII=3.01,P<0.001),绝对不平等程度也增加(P<0.001)(吸烟率:SII=0.14,P<0.001 和 SII=0.19,P<0.001;戒烟率:SII=-0.15,P<0.001 和 SII=-0.27,P<0.001)。
实施公共场所禁烟令与吸烟率的短暂下降和戒烟率的短暂上升同时发生,但也导致了与吸烟相关的结果在 SES 方面的不平等程度扩大。