Tchicaya Anastase, Lorentz Nathalie, Demarest Stefaan
Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER), Department of Living Conditions, Health Research Team, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Scientific Institute of Public Health (WIV-ISP), OD Public Health and Surveillance, Brussels, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0153966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153966. eCollection 2016.
This study aimed to measure changes in socioeconomic inequalities in smoking and smoking cessation due to the 2006 smoking ban in Luxembourg. Data were derived from the PSELL3/EU-SILC (Panel Socio-Economique Liewen Zu Letzebuerg/European Union--Statistic on Income and Living Conditions) survey, which was a representative survey of the general population aged ≥16 years conducted in Luxembourg in 2005, 2007, and 2008. Smoking prevalence and smoking cessation due to the 2006 smoking ban were used as the main smoking outcomes. Two inequality measures were calculated to assess the magnitude and temporal trends of socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: the prevalence ratio and the disparity index. Smoking cessation due to the smoking ban was considered as a positive outcome. Three multiple logistic regression models were used to assess social inequalities in smoking cessation due to the 2006 smoking ban. Education level, income, and employment status served as proxies for socioeconomic status. The prevalence of smoking decreased by 22.5% between 2005 and 2008 (from 23.1% in 2005 to 17.9% in 2008), but socioeconomic inequalities in smoking persisted. Smoking prevalence decreased by 24.2% and 20.2% in men and women, respectively; this difference was not statistically significant. Smoking cessation in daily smokers due to the 2006 smoking ban was associated with education level, employment status, and income, with higher percentages of quitters among those with a lower socioeconomic status. The decrease in smoking prevalence after the 2006 law was also associated with a reduction in socioeconomic inequalities, including differences in education level, income, and employment status. Although the smoking ban contributed to a reduction of such inequalities, they still persist, indicating the need for a more targeted approach of smoke-free policies directed toward lower socioeconomic groups.
本研究旨在衡量卢森堡2006年禁烟令实施后吸烟及戒烟方面社会经济不平等状况的变化。数据来源于PSELL3/EU - SILC(卢森堡社会经济状况调查/欧盟收入与生活条件统计)调查,该调查是2005年、2007年和2008年在卢森堡对16岁及以上普通人群进行的一项代表性调查。将吸烟率及2006年禁烟令导致的戒烟情况作为主要吸烟相关结果。计算了两种不平等指标以评估吸烟方面社会经济不平等的程度及时间趋势:患病率比和差异指数。因禁烟令导致的戒烟被视为一项积极成果。使用三个多元逻辑回归模型评估2006年禁烟令导致的戒烟方面的社会不平等。教育水平、收入和就业状况作为社会经济地位的替代指标。2005年至2008年期间吸烟率下降了22.5%(从2005年的23.1%降至2008年的17.9%),但吸烟方面的社会经济不平等依然存在。男性和女性的吸烟率分别下降了24.2%和20.2%;这一差异无统计学意义。2006年禁烟令导致的日常吸烟者戒烟情况与教育水平、就业状况和收入相关,社会经济地位较低者中的戒烟者比例更高。2006年法律实施后吸烟率的下降也与社会经济不平等的减少相关,包括教育水平、收入和就业状况方面的差异。尽管禁烟令有助于减少此类不平等,但它们仍然存在,这表明需要针对社会经济地位较低群体采取更具针对性的无烟政策措施。