Hao Ying, Sheng Li, Zhang Yiwen, Jiang Fan, de Villiers Jill, Lee Wendy, Liu Xueman Lucy
Shanghai Children's Medical Center Affiliated with the Medical School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.
MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, China.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Feb 15;61(2):345-359. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0367.
We aimed to study narrative skills in Mandarin-speaking children with language impairment (LI) to compare with children with LI speaking Indo-European languages.
Eighteen Mandarin-speaking children with LI (mean age 6;2 [years;months]) and 18 typically developing (TD) age controls told 3 stories elicited using the Mandarin Expressive Narrative Test (de Villiers & Liu, 2014). We compared macrostructure-evaluating descriptions of characters, settings, initiating events, internal responses,plans, actions, and consequences. We also studied general microstructure, including productivity, lexical diversity, syntactic complexity, and grammaticality. In addition, we compared the use of 6 fine-grained microstructure elements that evaluate particular Mandarin linguistic features.
Children with LI exhibited weaknesses in 5 macrostructure elements, lexical diversity, syntactic complexity, and 3 Mandarin-specific, fine-grained microstructure elements. Children with LI and TD controls demonstrated comparable performance on 2 macrostructure elements, productivity, grammaticality, and the remaining 3 fine-grained microstructure features.
Similarities and differences are noted in narrative profiles of children with LI who speak Mandarin versus those who speak Indo-European languages. The results are consistent with the view that profiles of linguistic deficits are shaped by the ambient language. Clinical implications are discussed.
我们旨在研究患有语言障碍(LI)的讲普通话儿童的叙事技巧,以便与讲印欧语系语言的LI儿童进行比较。
18名讲普通话的LI儿童(平均年龄6岁2个月)和18名发育正常(TD)的年龄匹配儿童讲述了3个通过普通话表达叙事测试(de Villiers & Liu,2014)引出的故事。我们比较了对人物、场景、起始事件、内心反应、计划、行动和后果的宏观结构评估描述。我们还研究了一般的微观结构,包括产出率、词汇多样性、句法复杂性和语法正确性。此外,我们比较了用于评估特定普通话语言特征的6个细粒度微观结构元素的使用情况。
LI儿童在5个宏观结构元素、词汇多样性、句法复杂性以及3个特定于普通话的细粒度微观结构元素方面表现出弱点。LI儿童和TD对照组在2个宏观结构元素、产出率、语法正确性以及其余3个细粒度微观结构特征方面表现出相当的表现。
讲普通话的LI儿童与讲印欧语系语言的LI儿童在叙事概况上存在异同。结果与语言缺陷概况受周围语言影响的观点一致。讨论了临床意义。