Barrera V, Haas C, Meixner E A, Fliss B
Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190/52, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Int J Legal Med. 2018 Jul;132(4):1067-1074. doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1787-7. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
Dealing with a refurbished crime scene is a special challenge for forensic investigators. In such cases, a crime scene may not have only been cleaned in order to erase all traces but the walls of an indoor crime scene could also be painted over in order to mask traces of the crime. So far, very few publications have shown that painted-over traces of blood and seminal fluid can be detected using a forensic light source or infrared photography. To date, there have been no systematically executed research studies including guidelines on which settings to use depending on the color of the wall. Moreover, no comparative study has addressed the question of whether it is better to use infrared photography or a forensic light source to visualize painted-over bloodstains. The present study covers the aforementioned gaps and shows that painted-over bloodstains are most easily visualized by infrared photography, while traces of seminal fluid are most easily visualized at 440 nm in combination with a yellow filter-both independent of the color of the wall paint.
对法医调查人员来说,处理翻新过的犯罪现场是一项特殊挑战。在这类案件中,犯罪现场可能不仅被清理以抹去所有痕迹,室内犯罪现场的墙壁还可能被重新粉刷以掩盖犯罪痕迹。到目前为止,很少有出版物表明,使用法医光源或红外摄影可以检测到被粉刷覆盖的血迹和精液痕迹。迄今为止,还没有系统开展的研究,包括根据墙壁颜色应使用何种设置的指南。此外,没有比较研究探讨过使用红外摄影还是法医光源来使被粉刷覆盖的血迹显形效果更好的问题。本研究填补了上述空白,并表明,被粉刷覆盖的血迹通过红外摄影最容易显形,而精液痕迹在440纳米波长结合黄色滤光片时最容易显形——两者均与墙壁涂料的颜色无关。