a Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences , University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jun;41(12):1419-1426. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1429500. Epub 2018 Jan 28.
To examine educational professionals' knowledge and understanding of childhood brain injury.
Educational professionals from all schools in the state of Victoria, Australia, were invited to participate in an online cross-sectional survey consisting of 20 questions assessing knowledge of concussion and 30 questions examining knowledge of traumatic brain injury (n = 364).
On average, participants correctly answered 16/20 (80%) questions about concussion and 24.3/30 (81%) about traumatic brain injuries. Participants who had previously taught a child with a brain injury demonstrated greater knowledge of traumatic brain injury, but not concussion, than those who had not. There were no differences in knowledge of concussion or brain injury between participants who had and had not attended a briefing session about concussion. Misconceptions displayed by educators predominantly related to the ongoing effects and impact of both concussion and traumatic brain injury, including effects on emotion, cognition, and social behaviour, as well as the increased risk of multiple injuries following an initial brain injury. When participants' responses to the brain injury questionnaire were compared with results reported by Farmer and Johnson-Gerard in 1997 using the same questionnaire, many of the same misconceptions were evident in the two samples of educational professionals.
Although educators demonstrated reasonable understanding of concussion and brain injury, some gaps in knowledge were apparent. Providing educational professionals with further training and professional development regarding childhood brain injuries would enhance their preparedness to manage students with these injuries in the school environment. Implications for Rehabilitation Mild to moderate brain injuries are relatively common among school-aged children, and educators may be required to manage and support students with these injuries in the school environment. This study shows that educators generally have a good understanding of the symptoms and immediate effects of brain injuries, but have gaps in knowledge regarding the potential socioemotional, behavioural, and cognitive difficulties and vulnerabilities to multiple injuries that may be present during recovery. Pre-service training and professional development may increase educators' understanding and capacity to accommodate the needs of students with brain injuries.
考察教育专业人员对儿童脑损伤的知识和理解。
邀请澳大利亚维多利亚州所有学校的教育专业人员参加一项在线横断面调查,该调查由 20 个关于脑震荡的问题和 30 个关于创伤性脑损伤的问题组成(n=364)。
平均而言,参与者正确回答了 20 个关于脑震荡的问题中的 16 个(80%)和 30 个关于创伤性脑损伤的问题中的 24.3 个(81%)。与未教授过脑损伤儿童的参与者相比,曾教授过脑损伤儿童的参与者对创伤性脑损伤的了解更多,但对脑震荡的了解则不然。是否参加过关于脑震荡的简报会,对脑震荡或脑损伤的知识没有影响。教育工作者表现出的误解主要与脑震荡和创伤性脑损伤的持续影响和影响有关,包括对情绪、认知和社会行为的影响,以及在初次脑损伤后发生多次损伤的风险增加。当将参与者对脑损伤问卷的回答与 Farmer 和 Johnson-Gerard 在 1997 年使用相同问卷报告的结果进行比较时,两个教育专业人员样本中都存在许多相同的误解。
尽管教育工作者对脑震荡和脑损伤表现出合理的理解,但知识上仍存在一些差距。为教育专业人员提供有关儿童脑损伤的进一步培训和专业发展将增强他们在学校环境中管理患有这些损伤的学生的能力。
轻度至中度脑损伤在学龄儿童中较为常见,教育工作者可能需要在学校环境中管理和支持患有这些损伤的学生。这项研究表明,教育工作者通常对脑损伤的症状和即时影响有很好的了解,但对潜在的社会情绪、行为和认知困难以及在康复期间可能存在的多次损伤的脆弱性方面存在知识差距。职前培训和专业发展可能会提高教育工作者的理解能力,并增强他们满足脑损伤学生需求的能力。