Pahor Anja, Jaušovec Norbert
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jan 10;11:651. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00651. eCollection 2017.
A single blind sham-controlled study was conducted to explore the effects of theta and gamma transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on offline performance on working memory tasks. In order to systematically investigate how specific parameters of tACS affect working memory, we manipulated the frequency of stimulation (theta frequency vs. gamma frequency), the type of task (n-back vs. change detection task) and the content of the tasks (verbal vs. figural stimuli). A repeated measures design was used that consisted of three sessions: theta tACS, gamma tACS and sham tACS. In total, four experiments were conducted which differed only with respect to placement of tACS electrodes (bilateral frontal, bilateral parietal, left fronto-parietal and right-fronto parietal). Healthy female students ( = 72) were randomly assigned to one of these groups, hence we were able to assess the efficacy of theta and gamma tACS applied over different brain areas, contrasted against sham stimulation. The pre-post/sham resting electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis showed that theta tACS significantly affected theta amplitude, whereas gamma tACS had no significant effect on EEG amplitude in any of the frequency bands of interest. Gamma tACS did not significantly affect working memory performance compared to sham, and theta tACS led to inconsistent changes in performance on the n-back tasks. Active theta tACS significantly affected P3 amplitude and latency during performance on the n-back tasks in the bilateral parietal and right-fronto parietal protocols.
一项单盲假对照研究旨在探讨θ波和γ波经颅交流电刺激(tACS)对工作记忆任务离线表现的影响。为了系统地研究tACS的特定参数如何影响工作记忆,我们操纵了刺激频率(θ波频率与γ波频率)、任务类型(n-back任务与变化检测任务)以及任务内容(言语刺激与图形刺激)。采用了重复测量设计,包括三个阶段:θ波tACS、γ波tACS和假tACS。总共进行了四项实验,这些实验仅在tACS电极的放置位置上有所不同(双侧额叶、双侧顶叶、左侧额顶叶和右侧额顶叶)。健康女学生(n = 72)被随机分配到这些组中的一组,因此我们能够评估在不同脑区施加的θ波和γ波tACS的效果,并与假刺激进行对比。前后/假静息脑电图(EEG)分析表明,θ波tACS显著影响θ波振幅,而γ波tACS在任何感兴趣的频段对EEG振幅均无显著影响。与假刺激相比,γ波tACS对工作记忆表现没有显著影响,而θ波tACS导致n-back任务的表现出现不一致的变化。在双侧顶叶和右侧额顶叶方案的n-back任务执行过程中,主动θ波tACS显著影响P3振幅和潜伏期。