• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线讨论中的自我控制:去抑制性在线行为是未能识别社会线索的表现。

Self-control in Online Discussions: Disinhibited Online Behavior as a Failure to Recognize Social Cues.

作者信息

Voggeser Birgit J, Singh Ranjit K, Göritz Anja S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 11;8:2372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02372. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02372
PMID:29375457
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5768638/
Abstract

In an online experiment we examined the role of self-control in recognizing social cues in the context of disinhibited online behavior (e.g., flaming and trolling). We temporarily lowered participants' self-control capacity with an ego depletion paradigm (i.e., color Stroop task). Next, we measured participants' sensitivity to social cues with an emotional Stroop task containing neutral, negative, and taboo words. Sensitivity to social cues is represented by the increase in reaction time to negative and especially taboo words compared to neutral words. As expected, undepleted participants were slower to process the color of negative and taboo words. By contrast, depleted participants (i.e., those with lowered self-control capacity) did not react differently to taboo or negative words than they did to neutral words. The experiment illustrates that self-control failure may manifest itself in a failure to recognize social cues. The finding underlines the importance of self-control in understanding disinhibited online behavior: Many instances of disinhibited online behavior may occur not because people are unable to control themselves, but because they do not realize that a situation calls for self-control in the first place.

摘要

在一项在线实验中,我们研究了自我控制在识别去抑制性在线行为(如网络暴力和恶意挑衅)背景下的社会线索方面所起的作用。我们采用自我损耗范式(即颜色斯特鲁普任务)暂时降低参与者的自我控制能力。接下来,我们使用包含中性、负面和禁忌词汇的情绪斯特鲁普任务来测量参与者对社会线索的敏感度。对社会线索的敏感度表现为与中性词汇相比,对负面词汇尤其是禁忌词汇的反应时间增加。正如预期的那样,未损耗的参与者处理负面和禁忌词汇颜色的速度较慢。相比之下,损耗的参与者(即自我控制能力降低的那些人)对禁忌或负面词汇的反应与对中性词汇的反应没有差异。该实验表明,自我控制失败可能表现为无法识别社会线索。这一发现强调了自我控制在理解去抑制性在线行为中的重要性:许多去抑制性在线行为的发生可能不是因为人们无法控制自己,而是因为他们一开始就没有意识到某种情况需要自我控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dd9/5768638/2c13d3272026/fpsyg-08-02372-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dd9/5768638/2c13d3272026/fpsyg-08-02372-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dd9/5768638/2c13d3272026/fpsyg-08-02372-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-control in Online Discussions: Disinhibited Online Behavior as a Failure to Recognize Social Cues.在线讨论中的自我控制:去抑制性在线行为是未能识别社会线索的表现。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 11;8:2372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02372. eCollection 2017.
2
Aging, Emotion, Attention, and Binding in the Taboo Stroop Task: Data and Theories.禁忌斯特鲁普任务中的衰老、情绪、注意力与联结:数据与理论
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Oct 14;12(10):12803-33. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121012803.
3
Disentangling fast and slow attentional influences of negative and taboo spoken words in the emotional Stroop paradigm.在情绪 Stroop 范式中分离消极和禁忌口语词的快速和慢速注意影响。
Cogn Emot. 2016 Sep;30(6):1137-48. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1052780. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
4
Emotion, memory, and attention in the taboo Stroop paradigm.禁忌Stroop范式中的情绪、记忆与注意力
Psychol Sci. 2005 Jan;16(1):25-32. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00776.x.
5
Relations between emotion, memory, and attention: evidence from taboo stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks.情绪、记忆与注意力之间的关系:来自禁忌斯特鲁普任务、词汇判断任务及即时记忆任务的证据
Mem Cognit. 2004 Apr;32(3):474-88. doi: 10.3758/bf03195840.
6
Recalling taboo and nontaboo words.回忆禁忌词和非禁忌词。
Am J Psychol. 2008 Spring;121(1):83-103.
7
Finding the positive in all of the negative: Facilitation for color-related emotion words in a negative priming paradigm.在所有负面因素中寻找积极面:负启动范式下与颜色相关情感词的促进作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Oct;170:84-93. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
8
[The effect of taboo word on language processing].[禁忌词对语言加工的影响]
Psychiatr Hung. 2010;25(6):525-37.
9
Weakening self-control biases the emotional evaluation of appetitive cues.自我控制能力减弱会使对偏好线索的情绪评估产生偏差。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 31;12(1):e0170245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170245. eCollection 2017.
10
From words to action: Implicit attention to antisocial semantic cues predicts aggression and amygdala reactivity to angry faces in healthy young women.从言语到行动:对反社会语义线索的内隐注意预测健康年轻女性的攻击性和对愤怒面孔的杏仁核反应性。
Aggress Behav. 2018 Nov;44(6):624-637. doi: 10.1002/ab.21787. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Online and Unkind: Examining the Personality Correlates of Online Political Incivility.线上且不友善:探究网络政治不文明行为与人格的关联
Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2025 Feb;43(1):3-26. doi: 10.1177/08944393241249725. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
2
Life Stress and Cyberbullying: Examining the Mediating Roles of Expressive Suppression and Online Disinhibition.生活压力与网络欺凌:表达抑制和网络去抑制的中介作用检验
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Aug;52(8):1647-1661. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01791-w. Epub 2023 May 27.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Moral Disengagement through Technologies Questionnaire (MDTech-Q) in a Sample of Chilean University Students.

本文引用的文献

1
The Watching-Eye Effect on Prosocial Lying.“注视眼效应”对亲社会说谎的影响。
Evol Psychol. 2015 Sep 1;13(3):1474704915594959. doi: 10.1177/1474704915594959.
2
An updated meta-analysis of the ego depletion effect.自我损耗效应的最新荟萃分析。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jul;82(4):645-651. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0862-x. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
3
A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource.一系列关于消耗效应的元分析测试:自我控制似乎并不依赖于有限的资源。
智利大学生样本中通过技术进行道德脱离问卷(MDTech-Q)的心理测量特性
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 12;11(8):1097. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081097.
4
Constructive and obsessive criticism in science.建设性与强迫性批判在科学中的体现。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2022 Nov;52(11):e13839. doi: 10.1111/eci.13839. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
5
Citation impact and social media visibility of Great Barrington and John Snow signatories for COVID-19 strategy.大巴灵顿和约翰·斯诺签署的 COVID-19 策略的引文影响力和社交媒体可见度。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 9;12(2):e052891. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052891.
6
Beholden: The Emotional Effects of Having Eye Contact While Breaking Social Norms.感恩之情:打破社会规范时进行眼神接触的情感影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 26;12:545268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.545268. eCollection 2021.
7
Associations between Bystanders and Perpetrators of Online Hate: The Moderating Role of Toxic Online Disinhibition.旁观者和网络仇恨行为者之间的关联:网络去抑制的毒性的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 17;15(9):2030. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15092030.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Aug;144(4):796-815. doi: 10.1037/xge0000083. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
4
Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth.数字时代的欺凌行为:对青少年网络欺凌研究的批判性回顾和元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;140(4):1073-137. doi: 10.1037/a0035618. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
5
Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism.日常施虐癖的行为确认。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2201-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797613490749. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
6
Anger on the internet: the perceived value of rant-sites.网络愤怒:咆哮网站的感知价值。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Feb;16(2):119-22. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0130. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
7
Taking stock of self-control: a meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors.自我控制盘点:特质自我控制与广泛行为关系的元分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 Feb;16(1):76-99. doi: 10.1177/1088868311418749. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
8
Ego depletion--is it all in your head? implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation.自我损耗——都是你的心理作用?关于意志力的内隐理论会影响自我调节。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;21(11):1686-93. doi: 10.1177/0956797610384745. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
9
Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis.自我损耗与自我控制的强度模型:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;136(4):495-525. doi: 10.1037/a0019486.
10
Cyberbullying: the new face of workplace bullying?网络欺凌:职场欺凌的新面孔?
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Aug;12(4):395-400. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0025.