Adriaensen Wim, Dorlo Thomas P C, Vanham Guido, Kestens Luc, Kaye Paul M, van Griensven Johan
Unit of HIV and Neglected Tropical Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Immunol. 2018 Jan 12;8:1943. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01943. eCollection 2017.
Patients with visceral leishmaniasis (VL)-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection experience increased drug toxicity and treatment failure rates compared to VL patients, with more frequent VL relapse and death. In the era of VL elimination strategies, HIV coinfection is progressively becoming a key challenge, because HIV-coinfected patients respond poorly to conventional VL treatment and play an important role in parasite transmission. With limited chemotherapeutic options and a paucity of novel anti-parasitic drugs, new interventions that target host immunity may offer an effective alternative. In this review, we first summarize current views on how VL immunopathology is significantly affected by HIV coinfection. We then review current clinical and promising preclinical immunomodulatory interventions in the field of VL and discuss how these may operate in the context of a concurrent HIV infection. Caveats are formulated as these interventions may unpredictably impact the delicate balance between boosting of beneficial VL-specific responses and deleterious immune activation/hyperinflammation, activation of latent provirus or increased HIV-susceptibility of target cells. Evidence is lacking to prioritize a target molecule and a more detailed account of the immunological status induced by the coinfection as well as surrogate markers of cure and protection are still required. We do, however, argue that virologically suppressed VL patients with a recovered immune system, in whom effective antiretroviral therapy alone is not able to restore protective immunity, can be considered a relevant target group for an immunomodulatory intervention. Finally, we provide perspectives on the translation of novel theories on synergistic immune cell cross-talk into an effective treatment strategy for VL-HIV-coinfected patients.
与内脏利什曼病(VL)患者相比,内脏利什曼病合并人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染的患者药物毒性增加且治疗失败率更高,VL复发和死亡更为频繁。在VL消除策略时代,HIV合并感染正逐渐成为一项关键挑战,因为HIV合并感染的患者对传统VL治疗反应不佳,且在寄生虫传播中起重要作用。由于化疗选择有限且新型抗寄生虫药物匮乏,针对宿主免疫的新干预措施可能提供一种有效的替代方法。在本综述中,我们首先总结了目前关于HIV合并感染如何显著影响VL免疫病理学的观点。然后,我们回顾了VL领域当前的临床和有前景的临床前免疫调节干预措施,并讨论了这些措施在同时存在HIV感染的情况下可能如何发挥作用。需要注意的是,这些干预措施可能会不可预测地影响有益的VL特异性反应增强与有害的免疫激活/过度炎症、潜伏前病毒激活或靶细胞对HIV易感性增加之间的微妙平衡。目前缺乏确定目标分子优先级的证据,仍需要更详细地描述合并感染诱导的免疫状态以及治愈和保护的替代标志物。然而,我们认为,对于病毒学得到抑制且免疫系统已恢复,但仅靠有效的抗逆转录病毒疗法无法恢复保护性免疫的VL患者,可以考虑将其作为免疫调节干预的相关目标群体。最后,我们就将协同免疫细胞相互作用的新理论转化为VL-HIV合并感染患者的有效治疗策略提供了观点。