Liao Xing, Yu Dan-Dan, Xie Yan-Ming, Guo Yu-Bo, Zhang Xiao-Xiao, Fan Chang-Zheng, Chen Wei, Jiang Jun-Jie, Wang Yong-Yan
Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Standards and Guidlinie Developing Office, China Association of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2017 Dec;42(23):4520-4528. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20171012.007.
Clinical practice guideline (CPG) should be concise and readability, which can be possible to implement CPG into practice smoothly. A formal published CPG can't load its developing process and details. An editorial explanation of CPG is much useful to show details and logic process of developing CPG. Although there are many different standards for developing CPG, being nothing to do with process management of CPG. By referring to editorial explanation on international standards, a request for CPG was investigated in this study. An editorial explanation for clinical practice guideline should be transparency, logic and traceable. A good editorial explanation could make users or readers to learn what goes on behind the scenes. A standardized editorial explanation could supervise the GCP developing and improve the quality of GCP.
临床实践指南（CPG）应简洁且具有可读性，以便能够顺利地将其应用于实践。正式发布的CPG无法呈现其制定过程和细节。CPG的编辑解释对于展示CPG制定的细节和逻辑过程非常有用。尽管制定CPG有许多不同的标准，但这与CPG的过程管理无关。通过参考关于国际标准的编辑解释，本研究对CPG的要求进行了调查。临床实践指南的编辑解释应透明、合乎逻辑且可追溯。一个好的编辑解释可以让用户或读者了解幕后发生的事情。标准化的编辑解释可以监督CPG的制定并提高CPG的质量。
