• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对“从PI释放”现象的重新审视:语义转换后回忆准确性并未恢复。

Re-examination of "release-from-PI" phenomena: recall accuracy does not recover after a semantic switch.

作者信息

Hubbard Nicholas A, Weaver Travis P, Turner Monroe P, Rypma Bart

机构信息

a McGovern Institute for Brain Research , Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge , MA , USA.

b Department of Psychology , Vanderbilt University , Nashville , TN , USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2018 Oct;26(9):1191-1205. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1428349. Epub 2018 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2018.1428349
PMID:29376767
Abstract

Recall accuracy decreases over successive memory trials using similar memoranda. This effect reflects proactive interference (PI) - the tendency for previously studied information to reduce recall of new information. However, recall improves if memoranda for a subsequent trial are semantically dissimilar from the previous trials. This improvement is thought to reflect a release from PI. We tested whether PI is reduced or released from the semantic category for which it had been induced by employing paradigms which featured inducement, semantic switch, and then return-to-original category epochs. Two experiments confirmed that PI was not released after various semantic switch trials (effects from d = -0.93 to -1.6). Combined analyses from both studies demonstrated that the number of intervening new category trials did not reduce or release PI. In fact, in all conditions recall accuracy decreased, demonstrating that PI is maintained and can increase after the new category trials. The release-from-PI account cannot accommodate these broader dynamics of PI. This account is also incongruent with evidence and theory from cognitive psychology, linguistics, and neuroscience. We propose a reintroduction-of-PI account which explains these broader PI dynamics and is consistent with the wider psychological and neurosciences.

摘要

在使用相似记忆材料进行连续的记忆试验时,回忆准确性会下降。这种效应反映了前摄干扰(PI)——即先前学习的信息会降低对新信息的回忆的倾向。然而,如果后续试验的记忆材料在语义上与先前试验不同,回忆会得到改善。这种改善被认为反映了从PI中的解脱。我们通过采用具有诱导、语义转换以及随后回归原始类别阶段的范式,测试了PI是否从其被诱导的语义类别中减少或解脱。两项实验证实,在各种语义转换试验后,PI并未解脱(效应值从d = -0.93到 -1.6)。两项研究的综合分析表明,中间新类别试验的数量并未减少或解脱PI。事实上,在所有条件下回忆准确性都下降了,这表明PI在新类别试验后仍持续存在且可能增强。从PI解脱的观点无法解释PI的这些更广泛的动态变化。这个观点也与认知心理学、语言学和神经科学的证据及理论不一致。我们提出了一个重新引入PI的观点,它解释了这些更广泛的PI动态变化,并且与更广泛的心理学和神经科学相一致。

相似文献

1
Re-examination of "release-from-PI" phenomena: recall accuracy does not recover after a semantic switch.对“从PI释放”现象的重新审视:语义转换后回忆准确性并未恢复。
Memory. 2018 Oct;26(9):1191-1205. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1428349. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
2
Electrophysiological evidence that release from proactive inhibition reflects late semantic processing.电生理学证据表明,前摄性抑制的释放反映了晚期语义加工。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Oct;57(10):e13639. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13639. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory.工作记忆中的前摄干扰与项目相似性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar;32(2):183-196. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.183.
4
Proactive interference in a semantic short-term memory deficit: role of semantic and phonological relatedness.语义短期记忆缺陷中的前摄干扰:语义和语音相关性的作用。
Cortex. 2007 Jan;43(1):112-23. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70449-0.
5
Order recall in verbal short-term memory: The role of semantic networks.言语短期记忆中的序列回忆:语义网络的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Apr;43(3):489-99. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0470-6.
6
Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.语义和语音对短期复述及长期线索化句子回忆的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Feb;44(2):307-29. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0554-y.
7
Does semantic long-term memory impact refreshing in verbal working memory?语义长时记忆是否影响言语工作记忆的刷新?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Sep;45(9):1664-1682. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000657. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
8
Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency.工作记忆容量和搜索效率的个体差异。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Oct;46(7):1149-1163. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0827-3.
9
Cuing effects in short-term recall.短期记忆中的线索效应。
Mem Cognit. 1996 Nov;24(6):719-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03201097.
10
Type-specific proactive interference in patients with semantic and phonological STM deficits.语义和语音短期记忆缺陷患者的类型特异性前摄干扰。
Memory. 2014;22(8):972-89. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.860171. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of categorical stimuli on relational memory binding.类别刺激对关系记忆绑定的影响。
Learn Mem. 2024 Oct 31;31(10-11). doi: 10.1101/lm.054006.124. Print 2024 Oct-Nov.