Department of Psychology.
Department of Psychology, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Sep;45(9):1664-1682. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000657. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
Attentional refreshing allows the maintenance of information in working memory and has received growing interest in recent years. However, it is still ill-defined and several proposals have been put forward to account for its functioning. Among them, some proposals suggest that refreshing relies on the retrieval of knowledge from semantic long-term memory. To examine such a proposal, the present study examined the impact on refreshing of two effects known to affect the retrieval from semantic long-term memory: word frequency and lexicality. In working memory span tasks, participants had to maintain memoranda varying in either frequency, or lexicality while performing concurrent tasks. By examining recall performance in complex span tasks and response times for the concurrent task in Brown-Peterson tasks, the present study provided evidence that long-term memory effects (a) affected recall without interacting with manipulation of refreshing and (b) did not affect refreshing speed. These findings challenge the idea that refreshing acts through the retrieval of knowledge from semantic long-term memory. Different WM models are discussed to account for these findings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
注意刷新允许工作记忆中信息的维持,近年来受到越来越多的关注。然而,它的定义仍然不明确,已经提出了几种建议来解释它的功能。其中,一些建议认为刷新依赖于从语义长时记忆中检索知识。为了检验这一假设,本研究考察了两种已知影响从语义长时记忆中检索的效应(词频和词汇性)对刷新的影响。在工作记忆广度任务中,参与者必须在执行并发任务的同时保持记忆项的频率或词汇性变化。通过考察复杂跨度任务中的回忆表现和布朗-彼得森任务中并发任务的反应时间,本研究提供了证据表明,长时记忆效应(a)影响回忆,而不与刷新的操作相互作用;(b)不影响刷新速度。这些发现挑战了刷新通过从语义长时记忆中检索知识起作用的观点。讨论了不同的 WM 模型来解释这些发现。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。