皮肤自发荧光、动脉僵硬度和弗雷明汉风险评分预测慢性肾脏病患者临床转归的队列研究。

Skin autofluorescence, arterial stiffness and Framingham risk score as predictors of clinical outcome in chronic kidney disease patients: a cohort study.

机构信息

Division of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Campus Flemingsberg, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Mar 1;34(3):442-448. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx371.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is predicted by Framingham's CVD risk scores (FRS) but the high CVD-related mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is only partially explained by traditional CVD risk markers. Therefore, there is a need to explore whether other CVD risk markers may improve risk prediction. Although arterial stiffness measured by augmentation index (AIx) and tissue content of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) measured by skin autofluorescence (SAF) are two biomarkers that associate with CVD and mortality in CKD, it is not known how they compare with FRS. We evaluated associations between SAF, AIx and FRS, and their associations with CVD and mortality in CKD patients.

METHODS

SAF (AGE Reader) and AIx (SphygmoCor; adjusted for 75 heart beats per minute) were measured in 261 clinically stable and extensively phenotyped patients with CKD Stage 5 (median age 56 years, 66% male, 20% diabetes; 130 non-dialysed, 93 patients on peritoneal dialysis and 38 patients on haemodialysis). Multivariate receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and multivariate Cox models followed by C-statistics were used to evaluate CVD-related and all-cause mortality risk associated with SAF, AIx and FRS during follow-up for median 25 months with 46 deaths.

RESULTS

In multivariate regression analysis, SAF associated with FRS, haemoglobin, fat body mass index and CVD, and inversely with per cent handgrip strength (HGS). AIx associated with FRS, and inversely with per cent HGS. Associations of SAF and AIx with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), serum albumin, statin therapy and renal replacement therapy were not statistically significant. In ROC analysis, area under the curve (AUC) for CVD mortality ranged from AUC = 0.72 (AIx and FRS, respectively) to AUC = 0.78 (FRS + AIx), and for all-cause mortality from AUC = 0.70 (AIx) to AUC = 0.79 (FRS + AIx). In multivariate Cox analysis, after adjusting for 1-standard deviation (1-SD) of FRS, 1-SD increase of SAF associated with all-cause mortality and 1-SD increase of AIx associated with CVD mortality and all-cause mortality. After further adjustments for hsCRP, albumin and presence of CVD, AIx (but not SAF) remained independently associated with CVD mortality, hazard ratio (HR) 2.14 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.18-3.89] and all-cause mortality, HR 1.74 (95% CI 1.16-2.60).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CKD Stage 5, SAF and aortic stiffness associated with mortality, independently of FRS. After adjusting for additional confounders including inflammation, aortic stiffness remained as an independent predictor of outcome. Since the contribution of SAF and aortic stiffness compared with FRS in ROC curve analysis was relatively modest, this underlines the importance of traditional CVD risk factors in CKD.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病 (CVD) 的风险可通过弗雷明汉心血管疾病风险评分 (FRS) 进行预测,但慢性肾脏病 (CKD) 患者的 CVD 相关死亡率仅部分可通过传统 CVD 风险标志物进行解释。因此,有必要探讨其他 CVD 风险标志物是否能改善风险预测。虽然通过增强指数 (AIx) 测量的动脉僵硬和通过皮肤自发荧光 (SAF) 测量的晚期糖基化终产物 (AGEs) 组织含量是与 CKD 中的 CVD 和死亡率相关的两个生物标志物,但尚不清楚它们与 FRS 相比如何。我们评估了 SAF、AIx 和 FRS 之间的相关性,以及它们与 CKD 患者 CVD 和死亡率之间的相关性。

方法

在 261 名临床稳定且广泛表型的 CKD 5 期患者(中位年龄 56 岁,66%为男性,20%患有糖尿病;130 名非透析患者,93 名腹膜透析患者和 38 名血液透析患者)中测量了 SAF(AGE Reader)和 AIx(SphygmoCor;调整为 75 次心跳/分钟)。使用多变量接收器工作特性 (ROC) 曲线分析和多变量 Cox 模型,然后使用 C 统计量,评估在中位随访 25 个月期间,与 SAF、AIx 和 FRS 相关的 CVD 相关和全因死亡率风险,共发生 46 例死亡。

结果

在多变量回归分析中,SAF 与 FRS、血红蛋白、脂肪体质量指数和 CVD 相关,与手握力量百分比 (HGS) 呈负相关。AIx 与 FRS 相关,与 HGS 百分比呈负相关。SAF 和 AIx 与高敏 C 反应蛋白 (hsCRP)、血清白蛋白、他汀类药物治疗和肾脏替代治疗之间的相关性无统计学意义。在 ROC 分析中,CVD 死亡率的曲线下面积 (AUC) 范围从 AUC=0.72(AIx 和 FRS,分别)到 AUC=0.78(FRS+AIx),全因死亡率的 AUC 范围从 AUC=0.70(AIx)到 AUC=0.79(FRS+AIx)。在多变量 Cox 分析中,在校正 FRS 的 1 个标准差 (1-SD) 后,SAF 每增加 1-SD 与全因死亡率相关,AIx 每增加 1-SD 与 CVD 死亡率和全因死亡率相关。进一步校正 hsCRP、白蛋白和 CVD 的存在后,AIx(而非 SAF)与 CVD 死亡率相关,危险比 (HR) 为 2.14[95%置信区间 (95% CI) 1.18-3.89],与全因死亡率相关,HR 为 1.74(95% CI 1.16-2.60)。

结论

在 CKD 5 期患者中,SAF 和主动脉僵硬与死亡率相关,独立于 FRS。在调整了包括炎症在内的其他混杂因素后,主动脉僵硬仍然是结局的独立预测因素。由于 SAF 和主动脉僵硬在 ROC 曲线分析中的贡献相对较小,这突显了传统 CVD 危险因素在 CKD 中的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索