Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of General Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3525-3532. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6074-7. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
Despite substantial evidence demonstrating benefits of minimally invasive surgery, a large percentage of right colectomies are still performed via an open technique. Most laparoscopic right colectomies are completed as a hybrid procedure with extracorporeal anastomosis. As part of a pure minimally invasive procedure, intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) may confer additional benefits for patients. The robotic platform may shorten the learning curve for minimally invasive right colectomy with ICA.
From January 2014 to May 2016, 49 patients underwent robotic-assisted right colectomy by a board-certified colorectal surgeon (S.R). Extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) was used in the first 20 procedures, whereas ICA was used in all subsequent procedures. Outcomes recorded in a database for retrospective review included operating time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), conversion rate, complications, readmissions, and mortality rate.
Comparison of average OT, EBL, and LOS between extracorporeal and intracorporeal groups demonstrated no significant differences. For all patients, average OT was 141.6 ± 25.8 (range 86-192) min, average EBL was 59.5 ± 83.3 (range 0-500) mL, and average LOS was 3.4 ± 1.19 (range 1.5-8) days. Four patients required conversion, all of which occurred in the extracorporeal group. There were no conversions after the 18th procedure. The 60-day mortality rate was 0%. There were no anastomotic leaks, ostomies created, or readmissions. As the surgeon gained experience, a statistically significant increase in lymph node sampling was observed in oncologic cases (p = .02).
The robotic platform may help more surgeons safely and efficiently transition to a purely minimally invasive procedure, enabling more patients to reap the benefits of less invasive surgery. Transitioning from ECA to ICA during robotic right colectomy resulted in no significant change in OT or LOS. A lower rate of conversion to open surgery was noted with increased experience.
尽管有大量证据表明微创手术有优势,但仍有很大一部分右半结肠切除术是通过开腹手术进行的。大多数腹腔镜右半结肠切除术是作为一种混合手术,进行体外吻合。作为一种纯粹的微创手术,腔内吻合(ICA)可能会为患者带来额外的益处。机器人平台可能会缩短具有 ICA 的微创右半结肠切除术的学习曲线。
从 2014 年 1 月到 2016 年 5 月,由一名经过委员会认证的结直肠外科医生(S.R.)对 49 名患者进行了机器人辅助右半结肠切除术。前 20 例采用体外吻合(ECA),而所有后续手术均采用腔内吻合。从数据库中回顾性记录了手术时间(OT)、估计出血量(EBL)、住院时间(LOS)、转化率、并发症、再入院和死亡率等结果。
比较 ECA 组和 ICA 组的平均 OT、EBL 和 LOS,无显著差异。所有患者的平均 OT 为 141.6±25.8(范围 86-192)min,平均 EBL 为 59.5±83.3(范围 0-500)mL,平均 LOS 为 3.4±1.19(范围 1.5-8)天。4 例患者需要转换,均发生在 ECA 组。第 18 例手术后无转换。60 天死亡率为 0%。无吻合漏、造口或再入院。随着外科医生经验的增加,在肿瘤病例中观察到淋巴结取样的数量有统计学意义的增加(p=0.02)。
机器人平台可能帮助更多的外科医生安全、有效地过渡到完全微创的手术,使更多的患者受益于微创手术。在机器人右半结肠切除术中,从 ECA 到 ICA 的转换并没有导致 OT 或 LOS 显著改变。随着经验的增加,转换为开放手术的比例降低。