Suppr超能文献

机器人右半结肠切除术的腔内和腔外吻合的短期结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Short-term outcomes of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in robotic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

Department of Anorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Jul;26(7):529-535. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02599-9. Epub 2022 Mar 26.

Abstract

Ileocolic anastomosis is performed via extracorporeal or intracorporeal techniques in robotic right hemicolectomy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the short-term outcomes of intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) for robotic right colectomy. The EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically (from inception until March 1, 2020) for randomized and non-randomized control trials reporting the short-term outcomes of IA and EA for robotic right colectomy. Five observational cohort studies involving 585 participants were included in our meta-analysis. Compared to the EA group, the IA group showed significantly longer operation time [weighted mean difference (WMD): 28.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.88-43.89, p = 0.0002], lower rate of anastomotic leak (odds ratio: 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.85, p = 0.03), and shorter time to first flatus (WMD: - 0.57, 95% CI - 0.95 to 0.19, p = 0.003). However, pooled results revealed no difference in blood loss, complications, wound infection, incisional hernia, length of incision, and hospital stay between the IA and EA groups (p < 0.05). This meta-analysis indicated that IA was superior to EA in terms of anastomotic leak and time to first flatus, but inferior in terms of operation time. Large-scale, multicenter, randomized studies are needed to confirm our findings.

摘要

机器人右半结肠切除术可通过体外或体内技术进行回结肠吻合。本荟萃分析的目的是比较机器人右半结肠切除术中腔内吻合(IA)和体外吻合(EA)的短期结果。系统地检索了 EMBASE、PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库(从创建到 2020 年 3 月 1 日),以查找报告 IA 和 EA 用于机器人右半结肠切除术的短期结果的随机和非随机对照试验。本荟萃分析纳入了 5 项涉及 585 名参与者的观察性队列研究。与 EA 组相比,IA 组的手术时间明显更长[加权均数差(WMD):28.88,95%置信区间(CI)13.88-43.89,p=0.0002],吻合口漏的发生率较低(比值比:0.26,95%CI 0.08-0.85,p=0.03),首次排气时间更短(WMD:-0.57,95%CI -0.95 至 0.19,p=0.003)。然而,合并结果显示 IA 组和 EA 组在出血量、并发症、伤口感染、切口疝、切口长度和住院时间方面无差异(p<0.05)。本荟萃分析表明,IA 在吻合口漏和首次排气时间方面优于 EA,但在手术时间方面劣于 EA。需要进行大规模、多中心、随机研究来证实我们的发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验