Department of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Department of Management, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Stress Health. 2018 Aug;34(3):391-402. doi: 10.1002/smi.2798. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
Grounded in affective events theory, we investigated the effects of experimentally manipulated psychological contract breaches on participants' feelings of violation, subsequent perceptions of psychological contract strength, and organizational citizenship behaviours in a sample of working adults. Results support previous findings that pre-existing relational psychological contract strength interacts with severity of unmet promises or expectations. Specifically, individuals with high relational contracts who experience low severity of unmet promises/expectations have the lowest breach perceptions, whereas individuals with high relational contracts who experience more severe levels unmet promises/expectations experience the highest level of breach perceptions. Results also support the concept of a breach spiral in that prior perceptions of breach led to an increased likelihood of subsequent perceptions of breach following the experimental manipulation. Furthermore, consistent with affective events theory, results support the argument that a psychological contract breach's effect on specific organizational citizenship behaviours is mediated by feelings of violation and the reassessment of relational contracts. These effects were present even after controlling for the direct effects of the manipulated severity of unmet promises/expectations.
基于情感事件理论,我们在一组成年工作者样本中,研究了实验性心理契约违背对参与者违规感、后续心理契约强度感知以及组织公民行为的影响。研究结果支持了先前的发现,即预先存在的关系型心理契约强度与未满足的承诺或期望的严重程度相互作用。具体而言,经历低严重程度的未满足承诺/期望的高关系型契约个体,其违约感知最低,而经历更严重水平的未满足承诺/期望的高关系型契约个体,则经历最高水平的违约感知。研究结果还支持违约螺旋的概念,即先前的违约感知导致在实验操作后,后续违约感知的可能性增加。此外,与情感事件理论一致,研究结果支持以下论点,即心理契约违背对特定组织公民行为的影响是由违规感和关系契约重新评估来介导的。即使在控制了未满足的承诺/期望的操纵严重程度的直接影响后,这些影响仍然存在。