Suppr超能文献

邻里贫困与911救护车响应时间。

Neighborhood Poverty and 9-1-1 Ambulance Response Time.

作者信息

Seim Josh, Glenn Melody J, English Joshua, Sporer Karl

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Jul-Aug;22(4):436-444. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1416209. Epub 2018 Jan 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Are 9-1-1 ambulances relatively late to poorer neighborhoods? Studies suggesting so often rely on weak measures of neighborhood (e.g., postal zip code), limit the analysis to particular ambulance encounters (e.g., cardiac arrest responses), and do little to account for variations in dispatch priority or intervention severity.

METHODS

We merged EMS ambulance contact records in a single California county (n = 87,554) with tract-level data from the American Community Survey (n = 300). After calculating tract-level median ambulance response time (MART), we used ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to estimate a conditional average relationship between neighborhood poverty and MART and quantile regression to condition this relationship on 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of MART. We also specified each of these outcomes by five dispatch priorities and by three intervention severities. For each model, we estimated the associated changes in MART per 10 percentage point increase in tract-level poverty while adjusting for emergency department proximity, population density, and population size.

RESULTS

Our study produced three major findings. First, most of our tests suggested tract-level poverty was negatively associated with MART. Our baseline OLS model estimates that a 10 percentage point increase in tract-level poverty is associated with almost a 24 s decrease in MART (-23.55 s, 95% confidence interval [CI] -33.13 to -13.98). Results from our quantile regression models provided further evidence for this association. Second, we did not find evidence that ambulances are relatively late to poorer neighborhoods when specifying MART by dispatch priority. Third, we were also unable to identify a positive association between tract-level poverty and MART when we specified our outcomes by three intervention severities. Across each of our 36 models, tract-level poverty was either not significantly associated with MART or was negatively associated with MART by a magnitude smaller than a full minute per estimated 10 percentage point increase in poverty concentration.

CONCLUSION

Our study challenges the commonly held assumption that ambulances are later to poor neighborhoods. We scrutinize our findings before cautiously considering their relevance for ambulance response time research and for ongoing conversations on the relationship between neighborhood poverty and prehospital care.

摘要

背景

911救护车到达较贫困社区的时间是否相对较晚?表明情况确实如此的研究往往依赖于对社区的粗略衡量标准(如邮政编码),将分析局限于特定的救护车出诊情况(如心脏骤停急救),且几乎没有考虑调度优先级或干预严重程度的差异。

方法

我们将加利福尼亚州一个县的紧急医疗服务(EMS)救护车接触记录(n = 87,554)与美国社区调查的普查区层面数据(n = 300)进行合并。在计算出普查区层面的救护车中位响应时间(MART)后,我们使用普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归来估计社区贫困与MART之间的条件平均关系,并使用分位数回归来在MART的第25、50和75百分位数上确定这种关系。我们还按五个调度优先级和三种干预严重程度对这些结果进行了具体说明。对于每个模型,我们在调整了与急诊科的距离、人口密度和人口规模的同时,估计了普查区层面贫困率每增加10个百分点时MART的相关变化。

结果

我们的研究得出了三个主要发现。首先,我们的大多数测试表明普查区层面的贫困与MART呈负相关。我们的基线OLS模型估计,普查区层面贫困率增加10个百分点与MART减少近24秒相关(-23.55秒,95%置信区间[CI] -33.13至-13.98)。我们的分位数回归模型结果为这种关联提供了进一步证据。其次,在按调度优先级确定MART时,我们没有发现证据表明救护车到达较贫困社区的时间相对较晚。第三,当我们按三种干预严重程度确定结果时,我们也未能确定普查区层面的贫困与MART之间存在正相关。在我们的36个模型中的每一个中,普查区层面的贫困与MART要么没有显著关联,要么与MART呈负相关,每估计贫困集中度增加10个百分点,其幅度小于整整一分钟。

结论

我们的研究对救护车到达贫困社区较晚这一普遍假设提出了挑战。在谨慎考虑我们的发现与救护车响应时间研究以及关于社区贫困与院前护理关系的持续讨论的相关性之前,我们仔细审查了这些发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验