Liu Bonnie, Jana Kunal, Groot Gary
College of Medicine; University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Department of Urology; University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 Sep;11(9):E338-E343. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4237.
The Saskatoon Prostate Assessment Pathway (SPAP) was developed in 2013 in part to decrease the wait times between physician referral and biopsy for patients with suspected prostate cancer. Using an algorithm carefully designed to optimize appropriate prostate biopsy rates, physicians can directly refer patients for biopsy through the SPAP without seeing a urologist. All other patients are referred to the Saskatoon Urology Associates (SUA). The present study evaluates the performance of the algorithm.
971 patients seen at the SUA and 302 patients seen through the SPAP were identified. Information on age, biopsy status and outcome, risk stratification, and time between referral and biopsy was collected. Biopsy wait time data was analyzed using gamma distribution. Association between referral method and biopsy rate, and between referral method and risk stratification, was analyzed using Z-test.
The expected wait time from referral to biopsy for patients seen through SUA was 2.63 times longer than those seen through SPAP (34 vs. 91 days). The biopsy rate of patients seen in the SPAP was significantly higher than those by SUA (88% vs. 69%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.26; p<0.00001). There was no significant difference in positive biopsy rates for patients seen through the SPAP vs. SUA (81% vs. 74%, 95% CI -0.011,0.14; p=0.095), for detection of low-risk cancer, (12% vs. 10%, 95% CI -0.034,0.080; p=0.44), or for clinically relevant cancer, i.e., intermediate- and high-risk cancer, for SPAP vs. SUA (56.54% vs. 56.68%, 95% CI -0.091,0.089; p=0.49).
The algorithm used in the SPAP is effective in decreasing wait time to prostate biopsy and has the same cancer/pre-cancer detection rate, but at the cost of a higher biopsy rate. Both referral mechanisms result in few low-risk cancer detection biopsies, finding primarily cases of high- or intermediate-risk cancer.
萨斯卡通前列腺评估路径(SPAP)于2013年制定,部分目的是减少疑似前列腺癌患者从医生转诊到活检之间的等待时间。通过精心设计的算法来优化适当的前列腺活检率,医生可以通过SPAP直接将患者转诊进行活检,而无需看泌尿科医生。所有其他患者则被转诊至萨斯卡通泌尿外科协会(SUA)。本研究评估了该算法的性能。
确定了在SUA就诊的971例患者和通过SPAP就诊的302例患者。收集了有关年龄、活检状态和结果、风险分层以及转诊至活检之间的时间等信息。使用伽马分布分析活检等待时间数据。使用Z检验分析转诊方法与活检率之间以及转诊方法与风险分层之间的关联。
通过SUA就诊的患者从转诊到活检的预期等待时间比通过SPAP就诊的患者长2.63倍(34天对91天)。在SPAP就诊的患者的活检率显著高于在SUA就诊的患者(88%对69%,95%置信区间[CI]0.14 - 0.26;p<0.00001)。通过SPAP与SUA就诊的患者的活检阳性率在检测低风险癌症方面(12%对10%,95%CI -0.034,0.080;p = 0.44)以及在检测临床相关癌症(即中高风险癌症)方面(SPAP对SUA为56.54%对56.68%,95%CI -0.091,0.089;p = 0.49)均无显著差异。
SPAP中使用的算法在减少前列腺活检等待时间方面有效,并且具有相同的癌症/癌前病变检测率,但代价是活检率较高。两种转诊机制导致的低风险癌症检测活检很少,主要发现的是高风险或中风险癌症病例。