King Elizabeth M, Cerajewska Tanya L, Locke Matthew, Claydon Nicholas C A, Davies Maria, West Nicola X
Specialty Trainee, Restorative Dentistry, University of Bristol, Oral and Dental Sciences, Bristol, UK.
Lecturer, Restorative Dentistry, University of Bristol, Oral and Dental Sciences, Bristol, UK.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;76(6):1150-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.12.025. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
To investigate the efficacy of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF; BTI Biotechnology Institute, San Antonio, Spain) for the treatment of alveolar osteitis compared with a positive control (Alvogyl; Septodont, Maidstone, Kent, UK).
This single-center, single-blinded, randomized, 2-treatment, parallel study was conducted in a UK dental hospital. All healthy adults who presented with alveolar osteitis after tooth extraction over a 3-month period were invited to participate. Each socket was randomized and treated with 1 of 2 treatment modalities, a test treatment (PRGF) or a positive control (Alvogyl). After treatment, patients were reviewed at 3 and 7 days by a second clinician blinded to the treatment given. Outcome measures included pain, exposed bone, inflammation, halitosis, dysgeusia, and quality-of-life assessment.
Thirty-eight patients with data from 44 sockets (22 in the PRGF group and 22 in the Alvogyl group) were analyzed. The PRGF group showed significantly faster bone coverage and significantly decreased inflammation and halitosis (P < .05) compared with the control group receiving Alvogyl. There was no significant difference for pain, quality-of-life measures, or dysgeusia between groups.
PRGF predictably treated alveolar osteitis after tooth extraction compared with the conventional standard treatment of Alvogyl, which has been used for many years. PRGF could be considered an alternative treatment for alveolar osteitis and indeed appears to have considerable advantages over Alvogyl.
与阳性对照(Alvogyl;Septodont公司,英国肯特郡梅德斯通)相比,研究富含生长因子的血浆(PRGF;BTI生物技术研究所,西班牙圣安东尼奥)治疗干槽症的疗效。
这项单中心、单盲、随机、双治疗、平行研究在一家英国牙科医院进行。邀请了在3个月内拔牙后出现干槽症的所有健康成年人参与。每个牙槽窝随机接受两种治疗方式中的一种,即试验治疗(PRGF)或阳性对照(Alvogyl)。治疗后,由对所给予治疗不知情的第二位临床医生在第3天和第7天对患者进行复查。观察指标包括疼痛、暴露的骨组织、炎症、口臭、味觉障碍和生活质量评估。
对38例患者的44个牙槽窝(PRGF组22个,Alvogyl组22个)的数据进行了分析。与接受Alvogyl的对照组相比,PRGF组的骨覆盖明显更快,炎症和口臭明显减轻(P < 0.05)。两组之间在疼痛、生活质量指标或味觉障碍方面没有显著差异。
与已使用多年的传统标准治疗Alvogyl相比,PRGF可预测地治疗拔牙后的干槽症。PRGF可被视为干槽症的一种替代治疗方法,并且实际上似乎比Alvogyl有相当大的优势。