Section on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition,
Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and.
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 28;38(9):2294-2303. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2717-17.2018. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
A fundamental feature of cortical visual processing is the separation of visual processing for the upper and lower visual fields. In early visual cortex (EVC), the upper visual field is processed ventrally, with the lower visual field processed dorsally. This distinction persists into several category-selective regions of occipitotemporal cortex, with ventral and lateral scene-, face-, and object-selective regions biased for the upper and lower visual fields, respectively. Here, using an elliptical population receptive field (pRF) model, we systematically tested the sampling of visual space within ventral and dorsal divisions of human EVC in both male and female participants. We found that (1) pRFs tend to be elliptical and oriented toward the fovea with distinct angular distributions for ventral and dorsal divisions of EVC, potentially reflecting a radial bias; and (2) pRFs in ventral areas were larger (∼1.5×) and more elliptical (∼1.2×) than those in dorsal areas. These differences potentially reflect a tendency for receptive fields in ventral temporal cortex to overlap the fovea with less emphasis on precise localization and isotropic representation of space compared with dorsal areas. Collectively, these findings suggest that ventral and dorsal divisions of EVC sample visual space differently, likely contributing to and/or stemming from the functional differentiation of visual processing observed in higher-level regions of the ventral and dorsal cortical visual pathways. The processing of visual information from the upper and lower visual fields is separated in visual cortex. Although ventral and dorsal divisions of early visual cortex (EVC) are commonly assumed to sample visual space equivalently, we demonstrate systematic differences using an elliptical population receptive field (pRF) model. Specifically, we demonstrate that (1) ventral and dorsal divisions of EVC exhibit diverging distributions of pRF angle, which are biased toward the fovea; and (2) ventral pRFs exhibit higher aspect ratios and cover larger areas than dorsal pRFs. These results suggest that ventral and dorsal divisions of EVC sample visual space differently and that such differential sampling likely contributes to different functional roles attributed to the ventral and dorsal pathways, such as object recognition and visually guided attention, respectively.
大脑皮质视觉处理的一个基本特征是将上下视野的视觉处理分开。在早期视觉皮层(EVC)中,上视野从腹侧处理,下视野从背侧处理。这种区别在几个枕颞皮质的类别选择性区域中仍然存在,腹侧和外侧的场景、面孔和物体选择性区域分别偏向于上下视野。在这里,我们使用椭圆形群体感受野(pRF)模型,系统地测试了男性和女性参与者 EVC 的腹侧和背侧分区内视觉空间的采样。我们发现:(1)pRF 倾向于呈椭圆形,朝向中央凹,EVC 的腹侧和背侧分区具有明显的角度分布,这可能反映了径向偏向;(2)腹侧区域的 pRF 较大(约 1.5 倍)且更椭圆(约 1.2 倍),这可能反映了腹侧颞叶皮层的感受野与中央凹重叠的趋势,而对空间的精确定位和各向同性表示的关注较少。这些差异可能反映了 EVC 的腹侧和背侧分区以不同的方式采样视觉空间,这可能有助于并/或源自于腹侧和背侧皮质视觉通路中观察到的视觉处理的功能分化。上下视野的视觉信息在视觉皮层中是分开处理的。尽管 EVC 的腹侧和背侧分区通常被认为以相同的方式采样视觉空间,但我们使用椭圆形群体感受野(pRF)模型证明了系统的差异。具体而言,我们证明了:(1)EVC 的腹侧和背侧分区表现出 pRF 角度分布的发散,这些分布偏向于中央凹;(2)腹侧 pRF 的纵横比更高,覆盖的区域比背侧 pRF 更大。这些结果表明,EVC 的腹侧和背侧分区以不同的方式采样视觉空间,这种差异采样可能有助于赋予腹侧和背侧通路不同的功能作用,例如物体识别和视觉引导的注意力。