Jung Eun Hye, Kim Seong-Joon, Yu Young Suk
Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea.
Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Clinical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;62(2):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0567-8. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
To compare the characteristics of intermittent exotropia patients according to their response to the diagnostic monocular occlusion test.
Retrospective study.
A retrospective review was performed of 141 patients with intermittent exotropia who had taken a monocular occlusion test before surgery. We classified the patients into 3 groups based on the response to monocular occlusion. The increase group was defined as those patients having an increase in deviation of ≥ 5 prism diopters (PD) after monocular occlusion as compared with the maximum measured angle. The decrease group was defined as those patients having a decrease in deviation of ≥ 5 PD. Otherwise, patients were classified as having no change. The patients' characteristics were compared among the groups.
At distance fixation, 9 patients (6.5%) were classified as increase, 92 patients (66.7%) as no change, and 37 patients (26.8%) as decrease after monocular occlusion. At near fixation, 50 patients (35.5%) were classified as increase, 65 patients (46.1%) as no change, and 26 patients (18.4%) as decrease. At distance fixation, no significant differences were found between the parameters of the patients in the increase group and those of the patients in the other 2 groups. In patients with a small maximum angle of exodeviation at near fixation and with few visits, the deviation at near fixation significantly increased after diagnostic occlusion.
Fifty-two patients (36.8%) showed an increase of ≥ 5 PD during distance or near fixation after monocular occlusion. In patients with a small maximum angle at near fixation and with few visits, it would be beneficial to perform the monocular occlusion test before surgery to reveal the maximal deviation angle, regardless of exotropia type.
根据间歇性外斜视患者对诊断性单眼遮盖试验的反应比较其特征。
回顾性研究。
对141例术前进行过单眼遮盖试验的间歇性外斜视患者进行回顾性分析。根据单眼遮盖试验的反应将患者分为3组。增加组定义为单眼遮盖后斜视度较最大测量角度增加≥5棱镜度(PD)的患者。减少组定义为斜视度减少≥5 PD的患者。否则,患者被分类为无变化。比较各组患者的特征。
在远距离注视时,单眼遮盖后9例患者(6.5%)被分类为增加,92例患者(66.7%)为无变化,37例患者(26.8%)为减少。在近距离注视时,50例患者(35.5%)被分类为增加,65例患者(46.1%)为无变化,26例患者(18.4%)为减少。在远距离注视时,增加组患者与其他两组患者的参数之间未发现显著差异。在近距离注视时外斜视角最大且就诊次数少的患者中,诊断性遮盖后近距离注视时的斜视度显著增加。
52例患者(36.8%)在单眼遮盖后的远距离或近距离注视期间斜视度增加≥5 PD。在近距离注视时外斜视角最大且就诊次数少的患者中,无论外斜视类型如何,术前进行单眼遮盖试验以揭示最大斜视角度是有益的。