Suppr超能文献

大规模植物蛋白质组学样本制备的优化管凝胶方法评估

Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics.

作者信息

Balliau Thierry, Blein-Nicolas Mélisande, Zivy Michel

机构信息

PAPPSO, GQE-Le Moulon, INRA, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Paris-Saclay University, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

出版信息

Proteomes. 2018 Jan 30;6(1):6. doi: 10.3390/proteomes6010006.

Abstract

The so-called tube-gel method is a sample preparation protocol allowing for management of SDS for protein solubilization through in-gel protein trapping. Because of its simplicity, we assumed that once miniaturized, this method could become a standard for large scale experiments. We evaluated the performances of two variants of the miniaturized version of the tube-gel method based on different solubilization buffers (Tris-SDS or urea-SDS). To this end, we compared them to two other digestion methods: (i) liquid digestion after protein solubilization in the absence of SDS (liquid method) and (ii) filter-aided sample preparation (FASP). As large-scale experiments may require long term gel storage, we also examined to which extent gel aging affected the results of the proteomics analysis. We showed that both tube-gel and FASP methods extracted membrane proteins better than the liquid method, while the latter allowed the identification and quantification of a greater number of proteins. All methods were equivalent regarding quantitative stability. However, important differences were observed regarding post-translational modifications. In particular, methionine oxidation was higher with the tube-gel method than with the other methods. Based on these results, and considering time, simplicity, and cost aspects, we conclude that the miniaturized tube-gel method is suitable for sample preparation in the context of large-scale experiments.

摘要

所谓的试管凝胶法是一种样品制备方案,它通过凝胶内蛋白质捕获来控制用于蛋白质溶解的十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)。由于其操作简单,我们认为一旦小型化,该方法可能会成为大规模实验的标准方法。我们基于不同的溶解缓冲液(Tris-SDS或尿素-SDS)评估了试管凝胶法小型化版本的两种变体的性能。为此,我们将它们与其他两种消化方法进行了比较:(i)在不存在SDS的情况下蛋白质溶解后的液体消化(液体法)和(ii)滤膜辅助样品制备(FASP)。由于大规模实验可能需要长期保存凝胶,我们还研究了凝胶老化对蛋白质组学分析结果的影响程度。我们发现,试管凝胶法和FASP法提取膜蛋白的效果均优于液体法,而液体法能够鉴定和定量更多的蛋白质。所有方法在定量稳定性方面相当。然而,在翻译后修饰方面观察到了重要差异。特别是,试管凝胶法中的甲硫氨酸氧化程度高于其他方法。基于这些结果,并考虑到时间、操作简便性和成本等方面,我们得出结论,小型化的试管凝胶法适用于大规模实验中的样品制备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/5874765/9ddfae810c14/proteomes-06-00006-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验